Resigning from motu-release and sponsor queue admins

2009-07-07 Thread Luca Falavigna
Hello, I decided to resign from motu-release and ubuntu-universe-sponsors queue administrator teams due to time constraints. These two roles require much attention than the one I can give to them right now. I would like to thank existing and former team members for their job and for the work done

Re: Resigning from motu-release and sponsor queue admins

2009-07-07 Thread Nathan Handler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Luca Falavigna wrote: > I decided to resign from motu-release and ubuntu-universe-sponsors queue > administrator teams due to time constraints. These two roles require > much attention than the one I can give to them r

Re: Resigning from motu-release and sponsor queue admins

2009-07-07 Thread Iulian Udrea
2009/7/7 Luca Falavigna > Hello, > Hello Luca > > I decided to resign from motu-release and ubuntu-universe-sponsors queue > administrator teams due to time constraints. These two roles require > much attention than the one I can give to them right now. > > I would like to thank existing and f

Re: Resigning from motu-release and sponsor queue admins

2009-07-07 Thread Luke Yelavich
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 05:23:20AM EST, Nathan Handler wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Luca Falavigna wrote: > > I decided to resign from motu-release and ubuntu-universe-sponsors queue > > administrator teams due to time constraints.

[REVU] [ubuntu/karmic] zeitgeist 0.1.0-0ubuntu1 (New)

2009-07-07 Thread Siegfried Gevatter
-- Forwarded message -- From: Ubuntu Installer Date: 2009/7/8 Subject: [ubuntu/karmic] zeitgeist 0.1.0-0ubuntu1 (New) To: Siegfried Gevatter NEW: zeitgeist_0.1.0.orig.tar.gz NEW: zeitgeist_0.1.0-0ubuntu1.diff.gz NEW: zeitgeist_0.1.0-0ubuntu1.dsc zeitgeist (0.1.0-0ubuntu1) karmi

libnet error

2009-07-07 Thread Jonathan Steel
Hi David, MOTU I have discovered a bug in libnet1 on a 64 bit Ubuntu machine. I'm sure the problem is from the original source as well, but since the homepage for libnet1 seems to not exist anymore, I can't tell. Basically the issue is that some of the data types were not explicitly declared t