Hi Martin,
Am Saturday 31 October 2009 10:57:21 schrieb Martin Pitt:
> Stefan Potyra [2009-10-31 2:58 +0100]:
> > That aside, I find it very interesting and disturbing that membership of
> > otherwise voted upon boards are (as it occurs to me from this mail)
> > prolonged by the will of one devel
On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 09:59:15 +0100 Daniel Holbach
wrote:
>Am Samstag, den 31.10.2009, 02:58 +0100 schrieb Stefan Potyra:
>> That aside, I find it very interesting and disturbing that membership of
>> otherwise voted upon boards are (as it occurs to me from this mail)
>> prolonged
>> by the wil
Stefan Potyra [2009-10-31 2:58 +0100]:
> That aside, I find it very interesting and disturbing that membership of
> otherwise voted upon boards are (as it occurs to me from this mail) prolonged
> by the will of one developer.
Well, it wasn't just that. It was discussed on th DMB list, and there
Am Samstag, den 31.10.2009, 02:58 +0100 schrieb Stefan Potyra:
> That aside, I find it very interesting and disturbing that membership of
> otherwise voted upon boards are (as it occurs to me from this mail) prolonged
> by the will of one developer. Maybe you can clear up what happened? Did that
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 18:04 +0100, Tristan Schmelcher wrote:
> I read over SourceForge's current policy docs and couldn't find any
> reference to their old requirement that projects release source
> tarballs, so I assumed it was no longer required. The source is all in
> SVN of course. I'm not com
