Re: Future of MOTU

2010-03-01 Thread Emmet Hikory
Michael Bienia wrote: > On 2010-02-22 12:53:09 +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote: >> ii) Coordinate with all the other Ubuntu Developer Teams to set up a >> distribution-wide REVU Coordination team, with representatatives from >> each development group helping to ensure that packages of interest to >> each

Re: Future of MOTU

2010-03-01 Thread Michael Bienia
On 2010-02-22 12:53:09 +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote: > A) Leadership > > We have historically been broadly without hierarchy, nominating > and recognising some of our number as leaders (5) as a result of their > continuing efforts in some area that directly improves the health of > the team. On

Re: Reorganize MOTU team documentation?

2010-03-01 Thread Emmet Hikory
Morten Kjeldgaard wrote: > I have to admit it: I hate the wiki. While it is very, very, very easy > to add new and quite good looking documentation, it is nearly > impossible to maintain, let alone get an overview of what is available > and what state it is in. I've complete agreement with thi

Re: Reorganize MOTU team documentation?

2010-03-01 Thread Benjamin Drung
Am Montag, den 01.03.2010, 16:37 +0100 schrieb Morten Kjeldgaard: > I have to admit it: I hate the wiki. While it is very, very, very easy > to add new and quite good looking documentation, it is nearly > impossible to maintain, let alone get an overview of what is available > and what state

Reorganize MOTU team documentation?

2010-03-01 Thread Morten Kjeldgaard
I have to admit it: I hate the wiki. While it is very, very, very easy to add new and quite good looking documentation, it is nearly impossible to maintain, let alone get an overview of what is available and what state it is in. In its current state, the Wiki contains loads of grossly out-of