Re: Reorganize MOTU team documentation?

2010-03-02 Thread Daniel Holbach
On 02.03.2010 00:01, Emmet Hikory wrote: 1) With Archive Reorganisation, the vast majority of documentation is no longer MOTU-specific, to the degree that aside from a basic set of team pages (overview, roadmap, meetings (and historical minutes), policy summary (mostly related to

Re: motu-release

2010-03-02 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 01:02:43PM +0100, Stefan Potyra wrote: Definitely makes sense. I don't have a strong preference over the exact procedure as well. How did ubuntu-release handle FFe's so far? I assume the worklist is the list of subscribed bugs? Yep, precisely. Do you also use the

Re: motu-release

2010-03-02 Thread Steve Langasek
Since there are no objections to the proposed diff, I've applied it now (plus Daniel's correction). I'll send out an announcement mail in the next day or so informing developers of the new procedure, then mass-migrate the motu-release bug subscriptions over to ubuntu-release. On Sun, Feb 28,

Re: Future of MOTU

2010-03-02 Thread Michael Bienia
On 2010-03-02 12:55:00 +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote: Michael Bienia wrote: On 2010-02-22 12:53:09 +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote: [MOTU Leaders] My main rationale for retaining it was in hopes that new folk would step forward to lead various aspects of what we do and help shape best practices

how can I get a working qprof?

2010-03-02 Thread Marco Marazza
Hi, I'm trying to install qprof through Synaptic Packet Manager, but it seems not to work at all. I've got ubuntu 9.10 (jaunty) on a x86_64 architecture From Synaptic, I downloaded qprof 0.5.2-5. But when I try to run qprof_start it turns out with: bash: qprof_start: command not found I also

Re: Future of MOTU

2010-03-02 Thread Morten Kjeldgaard
On Tuesday 02 March 2010 16:27:36 Morten Kjeldgaard wrote: I my opinion, REVU is a hugely useful tool. A lot of work has quietly been done on the software lately, in large part thanks to RainCT, and I now think it is quite close to ideal: easy to use, and robust. Uhm, well OK, it still needs

Re: Future of MOTU

2010-03-02 Thread Michael Bienia
On 2010-03-02 16:27:36 +0100, Morten Kjeldgaard wrote: On Tuesday 02 March 2010 00:06:49 Michael Bienia wrote: ii) Coordinate with all the other Ubuntu Developer Teams to set up a distribution-wide REVU Coordination team, with representatatives from each development group helping to

Re: Future of MOTU

2010-03-02 Thread Emmet Hikory
Michael Bienia wrote: On 2010-03-02 12:55:00 +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote: Michael Bienia wrote: On 2010-02-22 12:53:09 +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote: [MOTU Leaders] I fully understand that but do you have an idea how to keep this list of Leaders open so that no impression of a fixed list of

Re: Future of MOTU

2010-03-02 Thread Michael Bienia
On 2010-03-03 02:08:27 +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote: Michael Bienia wrote: On 2010-03-02 12:55:00 +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote: Michael Bienia wrote: On 2010-02-22 12:53:09 +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote: [MOTU Leaders] I fully understand that but do you have an idea how to keep this list of