Re: Future of MOTU

2010-03-24 Thread Brian J Mingus
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Benjamin Drung bdr...@ubuntu.com wrote: I have to admit that the barrier is high to get new packages into Ubuntu and that creating new packages is not the best way to start/learn packaging. It seems to be that folks manage to create a package but it's not

Re: Future of MOTU

2010-03-24 Thread Emmet Hikory
Brian J Mingus wrote: Yep! And since this is not a democracy I wonder who at Ubuntu has authorized the demise of the REVU system? Isn't it part of Canonical's Ubuntu vision and hasn't at least one paid employee been asked to do it? Wasn't that person supervised by someone and did they drop the

OpenERP 5.07

2010-03-24 Thread Humberto Yances
Hi! I've notice that new version of OpenERP (5.07) still remain outdate in universe ¿There is any advance for Lucid new release? We like to contribute and meet the manteiner. Thanks, Humberto Yances -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at:

Re: OpenERP 5.07

2010-03-24 Thread Lorenzo De Liso
Il giorno mer, 24/03/2010 alle 10.41 -0500, Humberto Yances ha scritto: Hi! I've notice that new version of OpenERP (5.07) still remain outdate in universe ¿There is any advance for Lucid new release? We like to contribute and meet the manteiner. Hello, The updated packages are already in

Re: Future of MOTU

2010-03-24 Thread Brian J Mingus
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 7:20 AM, Emmet Hikory per...@ubuntu.com wrote: Brian J Mingus wrote: Yep! And since this is not a democracy I wonder who at Ubuntu has authorized the demise of the REVU system? Isn't it part of Canonical's Ubuntu vision and hasn't at least one paid employee been

Re: Future of MOTU

2010-03-24 Thread Morten Kjeldgaard
On 23/03/2010, at 10.02, jdetaeye wrote: The tools and the intention of the REVU process are right. But if there aren't any reviewers working on the list, the process will remain broken. One problem is that we have no active REVU-coordinator for the time being, and that REVU-days have not

[BUG] Conflicting file in latest nvidia-settings_195

2010-03-24 Thread arielCo
Hello! I just got this from the Update Manager (Ubuntu Karmic): E: /var/cache/apt/archives/nvidia-settings_195.36.15-0ubuntu1~nvidiavdpauppa3_i386.deb: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/pixmaps/nvidia-settings.png', which is also in package nvidia-glx-195 0 Indeed, this file is in

Re: Future of MOTU

2010-03-24 Thread Morten Kjeldgaard
On 23/03/2010, at 22.32, Benjamin Drung wrote: How many people working on that task and how many Ubuntu packages needs to be ported to Debian? Can we rely on the folks who port Ubuntu packages back into Debian or is this more only a wish? Porting is not the problem, it's getting the