On Nov 08, 2013, at 08:34 PM, Robie Basak wrote:
>I more or less gave up using UDD. The problem is that I can't invest
>exclusively in that workflow. I try, and then sometimes I have a problem
>because of a package import failure. I don't think I touch that many
>packages, yet I've hit the issue s
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote:
>
> Though since we're talking about it, the one stop gap fix that would
> make me happy would be if all Ubuntu Developers could trigger the
> equivalent of the local 'requeue_package.py --full' command that UDD
> admins can run. Some
On Nov 08, 2013, at 01:33 PM, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote:
>> H. bzr-builddeb works fine for me. The problem is with the UDD
>> *branches*, which are an unmitigated disaster.
Well, not a complete disaster, unless you care about one of the currently 920
packages failing import. ;)
http://pa
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Robert Park wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:13 PM, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio
> wrote:
>> * UDD
>> - bzr-builddeb hasn't seen any real development in some time. I've
>
>
> H. bzr-builddeb works fine for me. The problem is with the UDD
> *branches*, which ar
