Please discount previous message (below).
An error in communicating a patch description.
Forwarded Message
Subject:libapache2-mod-xsendfile packaging inconsistency
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 11:04:52 +1300
From: GJB
To: ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Hi Robie,
T
Hi Robie,
Thanks for replying. Yes, I can see the sources linked and I'm quite
sure they are not the source that built the supplied module binary.
Open source systems supplying binaries that are not built using the
correct/advertised/documented sources kind of undermines the whole
concept of
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 05:49:00PM +1300, GJB wrote:
> this module is packaged with a binary built by the following source linked
> on this page
I'm not sure exactly what you're asking, but you can see the sources
used to build libapache2-mod-xsendfile for Ubuntu 22.04 (Jammy) here:
https://
Hi:
I'm the maintainer of Solaar. It appears that Solaar for Ubuntu was recently
upgraded from version 1.1.1 to version 1.1.5. I have a report that something
went wrong when he ran Solaar 1.1.5 -
https://github.com/pwr-Solaar/Solaar/issues/1785
I'm not sure why he ended up with an empty
Hi,
as per the link
https://packages.ubuntu.com/source/jammy/libapache2-mod-xsendfile
this module is packaged with a binary built by the following source
linked on this page
https://tn123.org/mod_xsendfile/
https://tn123.org/mod_xsendfile/mod_xsendfile.c#hash(sha256:8e8c21ef39bbe86464d3831f
