2008/8/8 Michael Casadevall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> not useful. The general idea is if you know a package (such as
> firefox2) that should be removed from the archive, create an inital
They'll be a lot of OpenStreetMap users unhappy about removing
Firefox-2, as currently it is impossible to load Ya
2008/6/8 Martijn van Iersel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm trying to create multiple pbuilders, as described in
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. I'm using the exact pbuilderrc
> mentioned in the howto, but with intrepid added to the list of possible
> values for DIST. It's not working. For some
On 07/02/2008, Luca Falavigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can file a new bug in Launchpad [1] or attach diff.gz/debdiff to
> existing bug reports [2], if your patch fixes some of them.
>
> [1] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagename/+filebug
> [2] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/
On 07/02/2008, Stefan Potyra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just for clarification: If the package you touch comes from debian, and there
> is no patch system present in the debian version, please don't start to
> introduce one. This will make future merges more easy (valid in both
> directions).
So
On 07/02/2008, Luca Falavigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is your package a new upstream revision? If so, you should publish new
> .diff.gz file for review, otherwise a debdiff between current Ubuntu
> version and yours is fine.
For my information - for both cases:
1. in case of a new upstream ve
Assuming I have patched a package in universe to fix a bug, and have
also created a package for the bugfix, where is the best place to put
it to get someone to check and upload it?
REVU?
sponsors-queue?
Assuming you just want the .diff.gz, would you want to see the source
directly patched, or wou
I have now packaged libgtk2-ex-printdialog for Debian.
Alternatively, I have also packaged the latest version of podbrowser
(also for Debian), which removes the libgtk2-ex-printdialog
dependency.
Regards
Jeff
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/11/2007, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> 4b. Contents of diff.gz should be in debian/. i.e. no inline patching.
Absolutely. Especially if there are patches on patches, anything else
makes things really hard for anybody to follow.
Regards
tesseract 2.01 has now been uploaded to Debian and is sitting in the
NEW queue (http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html). Therefore, would
some kind soul please remove it from REVU? As soon as it has hit
unstable, I will file a request to sync.
Regards
Jeff
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu
On 03/11/2007, David Clayton wrote:
> The download URL in version 0.2.0 is incorrect, it should be:
>
> http://dl.google.com/earth/client/current/GoogleEarthLinux.bin
And the options are non-standard i.e. they offer
--file
rather than
--file=
Regards
Jeff
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubunt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/11/2007, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> New packages require an understanding of pretty well all aspects of Debian
> packaging. With bug fixing, it's only a little bit at a time usually. As a
> result, bug fixing is genuinely a better place to start
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/11/2007, William wrote:
> You should upload to REVU
I did.
> Please ask MOTUs in #ubuntu-motu (irc.freenode.net) to review you package
I am almost never in a position to be on IRC. I had rather assumed
that the email generated by the upload t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/11/2007, Emmet Hikory wrote:
> Apologies for the lack of response. REVU has been receiving
> little to no reviews since the Gutsy Feature Freeze. The first
> scheduled REVU day for the Hardy cycle is the 5th of November, at
> which point y
I've been trying to do some packaging and am a little frustrated by the process.
When I decided to package v2 of tesseract
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tesseract/+bug/130848),
REVU was down, so on the premise that a Debian developer is an Ubuntu
developer, I uploaded to mentors.debia
On 19/10/2007, Neil Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For example is there any reason why MOTU wannabes couldn't do the
> package reviews and +1 them when they are happy? Then MOTUs only have
> to look at packages that have already passed through an acolyte. That
> helps train the acolytes and re
On 11/08/07, Michael Bienia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007-08-11 11:54:13 +0200, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote:
> You tried uploading to the Ubuntu archive and not REVU which is
> currently down.
Right. I hadn't spotted that I had to edit /etc/dput.cf
Does anyone why REVU
ecture: source
Version: 2.00-1
Distribution: gutsy
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jeffrey Ratcliffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Jeffrey Ratcliffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
tesseract-ocr - Command line OCR tool
Changes:
tesseract (2.00-1) gutsy; urgency=low
.
* Init
17 matches
Mail list logo
