Hi,
I have a couple of packages in Ubuntu (libmodglue1, cadabra) which came
in through a sync with Debian. These packages were made by me, but
uploaded to the Debian repositories by someone else. I need some advice
on how to keep these synchronised with my own sources (i.e. upstream).
I tried to
Hi Iulian,
> I have just taken a peak at it and IMO it ought to be useful for our users.
> Having said that, I'm interested in mathematics, so I believe I will have
> a deeper look at it tomorrow morning.
Ok, thanks! It's a bit of specialist's program, mostly used by
university-level students and
Hi all,
I need a 2nd advocate for my 'cadabra' package on REVU. It's a
symbolic computer algebra system with a graphical notebook front-end
with maths typesetting. Has been in REVU for a while now, so it would
be great if this could make it into karmic.
Thanks!
Cheers,
Kasper
--
Ubuntu-motu ma
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Packages/REVU/JauntyCleanupMessage
>
> I'd like to get this cleanup done tomorrow, so that we can start with
> a relatively clean REVU on Friday (the first REVU Day).
While we're at it, is something wrong with REVU uploads? I 'dput revu'
my two packages again yester
> I believe there are many in the Ubuntu community that feel more
> comfortable setting up packages for inclusion in Ubuntu as opposed
> to Debian, but that may be because they just aren't really aware of
> the Debian process.
Yes, I think this is a major issue. Ubuntu just feels much friendlier
t
> I'm pondering on running a script to move all those which don't have
> "jaunty" in debian/copyright to the "Needs work" section, leaving a
> comment asking to change it to "jaunty", check the standards version
> and some general recommendations (or perhaps just a link to a new wiki
> page), so th
Hi,
I have two packages on REVU (modglue & cadabra) which I would like to
get approved. They've been there for a while, and I was told to just
wait, but I'm wondering whether I missed something as it's been 1.5
months now and I only got some review feedback after I explicitly
asked, but no sign of
> Indeed, the version should end with "-0ubuntu1" and the distribution
> should be "intrepid".
Ok, fixed.
> > Ah, that's an interesting one which brings up another question. The
> > 'lie' package is actually only needed during build because the
> > autoconf script checks that this program is inst
> In addition to the last mail: I've tried to compile the package and it
> seems that "lie" is not in the "Build-depends", though it's required to
> compile the package.
Ah, that's an interesting one which brings up another question. The
'lie' package is actually only needed during build because t
Hi,
I have uploaded my computer algebra system "cadabra" to REVU a bit
over a month ago. Can someone please give this a look and help me with
the remaining lintian issues? Thanks a lot!
Cheers,
Kasper
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
h
10 matches
Mail list logo
