RE:Spyder Package Details In Need of Update

> Hello Mr. Vaillant and Debian/Ubuntu maintainers, Hello > My name is C.A.M. Gerlach, a member of the > Spyder IDE core dev team, and as part of the > broader effort in >

RE:DEB_XXX_MAINT_STRIP is not taken into account during build ???

Ok, I uploaded to debian unstable now it is fixed and synchronized for the ubuntu dev distribution. I prepared a package for saucy, compiled with pbuilder-dist I updated the description of the bug [1] for an SRU. I attached the debdiff to the bug the next things to do is to ask for this SRU and

DEB_XXX_MAINT_STRIP is not taken into account during build ???

Hello, I received a bug report about one of our users [3], explaining that my package (tango) is not working on ubuntu. (13.10). Indeed this software does not work if it was compiled with this LDFLAGS -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions So I put in the debian/rules file this line: export

RE:DEB_XXX_MAINT_STRIP is not taken into account during build ???

export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_STRIP = -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions This is trange because this was not a problem until recently... I will do the change and see if it works. thanks a lot now my question is , is it possible to fix 13.10 once I fixed my package ? thanks Fred -- Ubuntu-motu

RE:DEB_XXX_MAINT_STRIP is not taken into account during build ???

Perhaps something changed about how dpkg-buildflags parses the option and it became more pedantic, or perhaps it wasn't providing that flag previously? maybe in fact it is saner like this. It seems to work for me. I asked the upstream to double check this. Sure, and thank you for

RE:DEB_XXX_MAINT_STRIP is not taken into account during build ???

Thanks now juste question reading the StableReleaseUpdates, I understand that I need to target saucy-proposed right ? even if my package is from univers. the changelog version with the problem is: 8.0.5+dfsg-3 what is the version expected for this saucy update. thanks frederic --