Re: Future of MOTU

> helping to identify which of us have a real interest in working to > improve those packages. With this increased focus, we should be able > to do a much better job of keeping the entirety of the archive in good > shape for each release, and ensure that Ubuntu remains an incredibly &

Re: is that your final decision about removing the game "*ver god"

tt broke it down perfectly. If you feel offended, file a bug. First thing I will do is get the upstream author's attention to get feedback from them, as you seem not to be doing. Just because you have an issue with it doesn't automatically provide the reasoning to remove the package.

Andrew Starr-Bochicchio (asomething) to become MOTU

| Richard JOHNSON Title| Developer WWW| http://www.ubuntu.com Email| nixter...@ubuntu.com GnuPG| 9554 2BCC 3AA2 3898 0939 56E7 3EC9 A39D 2E2C 0124 Home| http://www.nixternal.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com Modify

Stefan Lesicnik (stefanlsd) to become MOTU

to be approved. -- Name| Richard JOHNSON Title| Developer WWW| http://www.ubuntu.com Email| nixter...@ubuntu.com GnuPG| 9554 2BCC 3AA2 3898 0939 56E7 3EC9 A39D 2E2C 0124 Home| http://www.nixternal.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu

Re: New Application processes

of the voters isn't familiar with that person. I really love the feedback we are getting thus far, and I look forward to more, where we can tweak the proposal and eventually turn it into something golden :) -- Richard JOHNSON Developer, http://www.kubuntu.org nixter...@kubuntu.org GPG: