On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:13 PM, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio
wrote:
> * UDD
> - bzr-builddeb hasn't seen any real development in some time. I've
H. bzr-builddeb works fine for me. The problem is with the UDD
*branches*, which are an unmitigated disaster.
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-m
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> [*] % grep '^Package: ' /var/lib/apt/lists/*_Sources | wc -l
> 43047
>
> 920 / 43047 =~ 2%
This number doesn't tell the whole story. Remember debian has a long
tail of packages that are very obscure / niche. It may be 2% of the
whole, but I wo
Sounds like a simple case of STDERR not getting piped along with STDOUT.
Try this:
bzr branch lp:~nskaggs/+junkautopilot-walkthrough 2>&1 | pastebinit
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:35 PM, John Kim wrote:
> I guess my concern with pastebinit is getting an output of a command.
>
> For instance, if I
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Robert Park wrote:
> I'm currently working on unifying as much as possible the 'master' and
> 'debian' branches, in the hopes that indeed there can be no patches
> and you can just drop the 'debian/' folder into the ups
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote:
>> Yes in theory, however I've been following a few other people's
>> request for sponsorship in debian-mentors and it seems nearly
>> impossible to get sponsorship during the freeze, because nobody cares
>> about new packages and everybody is
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio
wrote:
> So your would probably look like:
>
> version=3
> http://githubredir.debian.net/github/robru/gottengeography (.*).tar.gz
Oh, excellent. Thanks!
--
http://gottengeography.ca
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.c
Quite the thorough review, thank you!
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 5:52 AM, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Debian uses -1, -2, and so on for the package revision. Ubuntu appends
> ubuntu1, ubuntu2, and so on if they change something in the package.
> -0ubuntu1, -0ubuntu2, and so on is used if the package is
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Aditya Vaidya wrote:
> Also, just on a side note: I think the version you're submitting to Mentors
> (or wherever in Debian) should be "2.0-1", not "2.0-precise3".
This is the kind of answer I was looking for, thank you ;-)
I knew precise was wrong, but just wasn
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> The best reference I can see for that is [0]. Basically, either you mail
> the debian-mentors mailing list, asking for someone to sponsor it, or
> you file a bug against sponsorship-requests (which achieves the same
> thing, but keeps an ope
Hi all,
I'm a novice packager attempting to put together a package for my
GNOME application. I've successfully put together a working package,
and pushed it to my PPA here:
https://launchpad.net/~gottengeography/+archive/ppa
I also sent an IFP to debian's WNPP but I'm not really sure how to
proc
10 matches
Mail list logo
