ackage apart from the official
> interface (that is exactly what sudoers.d is for).
How am I supposed to use sudoers.d if it's disabled? Or will that
actually work, and the commented-out option is only if you want a
different includedir?
--
Tony Yarusso
Technical Team
___
Nagios Enterprise
:
> http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-opersys.html#s9.3.3.2
Okay. I was sort of under the impression that service was replacing
invoke-rc.d, although without any evidence. Just out of curiosity,
what's the difference between them?
--
Tony Yarusso
Technical Team
___
Nagios
I'd also be open to any other criticisms / improvements you have to
offer - I know it still has a long way to go to meet your normal
standards. For the time being I'm not expecting to get it up to snuff
for inclusion in the archives, rather just working, although that may be
a longer-ter
rned a lot
more about the packaging process overall than I would have with just one, or
even two. So, while we _could_ probably get by with one ACK, I don't think
it would be the most beneficial way of doing things.
--
Tony Yarusso
http://tonyyarusso.com/
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Emmet Hikory wrote:
> A month ago, an official list of Bug status values was published
> on launchpad [1]. Without a discussion of the appropriate
> classification of the various statuses that are used to track bugs
> that may someday be fixed, I would
