Hi again,
until now I've cleaned up the code to the point where separate tables are
possible, so that it might happen tomorrow eventually. I'll announce any
changes on #ubuntu-motu (which usually include two to three attempts of REVU
breakage)
However right now there is already a new icon:
* m
Hi,
Am Sonntag 04 November 2007 16:39:48 schrieb Emmet Hikory:
> Stefan Potyraのメッセージに:
> > Am Sonntag 04 November 2007 15:53:39 schrieb Emmet Hikory:
> > > First:
> > > Oldest-first list of packages where there is at least one
> > > advocation, and any comments after the advocation are by the
Stefan Potyraのメッセージに:
> Am Sonntag 04 November 2007 15:53:39 schrieb Emmet Hikory:
> > First:
> > Oldest-first list of packages where there is at least one
> > advocation, and any comments after the advocation are by the uploader.
> >
> > Second:
> > Oldest-first list of packages where any
Hi Emmet,
Am Sonntag 04 November 2007 15:53:39 schrieb Emmet Hikory:
> Am 11/4/07, schreib Stefan Potyra:
> > Am Freitag 02 November 2007 14:27:42 schrieb Jeffrey Ratcliffe:
> > [..]
> >
> > > The order of the packages on REVU seems to be semi-random.
> >
> > [..]
> >
> > It's not semi-random, but
Am 11/4/07, schreib Stefan Potyra:
> Am Freitag 02 November 2007 14:27:42 schrieb Jeffrey Ratcliffe:
> [..]
> > The order of the packages on REVU seems to be semi-random.
> [..]
>
> It's not semi-random, but rather mainly based on activity (iirc, number of
> comments, number of advocations play a r
Hi,
Am Freitag 02 November 2007 14:27:42 schrieb Jeffrey Ratcliffe:
[..]
> The order of the packages on REVU seems to be semi-random.
[..]
It's not semi-random, but rather mainly based on activity (iirc, number of
comments, number of advocations play a role in the order). The formula to
calcul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This would be a new revision of an existing package, not a package new
to Ubuntu. The two are very different, and one is much easier than the
other. Also, it doesn't have to be checked by the archive admins again,
which is good - makes it faster.
Ho
On 2007-11-02 14:00:53 -0400, Stephen Sinclair wrote:
> I listen in on this list just to occasionally get these kinds of
> insights. I find it odd, though, that MOTU is more interested in
> reviewing and accepting bug fixes than in new packages. It seems to
> me that there are two kinds of packag
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/11/2007, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> New packages require an understanding of pretty well all aspects of Debian
> packaging. With bug fixing, it's only a little bit at a time usually. As a
> result, bug fixing is genuinely a better place to start
On Friday 02 November 2007 14:00, Stephen Sinclair wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > Getting new packages into Ubuntu is one of the most challenging ways to
> > get involved in MOTU and packaging (it's how I did it too). You can also
> > help with fixing bugs in existing packages and merging updates from
> >
Stephen Sinclair wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> Getting new packages into Ubuntu is one of the most challenging ways to get
>> involved in MOTU and packaging (it's how I did it too). You can also help
>> with fixing bugs in existing packages and merging updates from Debian. These
>> are generally easier t
Hello,
> Getting new packages into Ubuntu is one of the most challenging ways to get
> involved in MOTU and packaging (it's how I did it too). You can also help
> with fixing bugs in existing packages and merging updates from Debian. These
> are generally easier to do and give you good experienc
On Friday 02 November 2007 10:53, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote:
> On 02/11/2007, William wrote:
> > You should upload to REVU
>
> I did.
>
> > Please ask MOTUs in #ubuntu-motu (irc.freenode.net) to review you package
>
> I am almost never in a position to be on IRC. I had rather assumed
> that the emai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/11/2007, William wrote:
> You should upload to REVU
I did.
> Please ask MOTUs in #ubuntu-motu (irc.freenode.net) to review you package
I am almost never in a position to be on IRC. I had rather assumed
that the email generated by the upload t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/11/2007, Emmet Hikory wrote:
> Apologies for the lack of response. REVU has been receiving
> little to no reviews since the Gutsy Feature Freeze. The first
> scheduled REVU day for the Hardy cycle is the 5th of November, at
> which point y
Hi Jeff!
On 11/2/07, Jeffrey Ratcliffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been trying to do some packaging and am a little frustrated by the
> process.
>
> When I decided to package v2 of tesseract
> (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tesseract/+bug/130848),
> REVU was down, so on the premis
On 11/2/07, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote:
> I've been trying to do some packaging and am a little frustrated by the
> process.
>
> When I decided to package v2 of tesseract
> (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tesseract/+bug/130848),
> REVU was down, so on the premise that a Debian developer is
I've been trying to do some packaging and am a little frustrated by the process.
When I decided to package v2 of tesseract
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tesseract/+bug/130848),
REVU was down, so on the premise that a Debian developer is an Ubuntu
developer, I uploaded to mentors.debia
18 matches
Mail list logo
