Hi,
Am Samstag 17 November 2007 05:57:18 schrieb Emmet Hikory:
> On Nov 17, 2007 5:52 AM, Stefan Potyra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My fear right now with these guidelines is that these will turn to be the
> > ultimate criteria to +1/-1 a source package and people will not check if
> > a packag
On Nov 17, 2007 5:52 AM, Stefan Potyra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My fear right now with these guidelines is that these will turn to be the
> ultimate criteria to +1/-1 a source package and people will not check if a
> package is in fact good or bad but rather go through this checklist w.o.
> loo
Hi,
first of big thanks for putting these guidelines together. It will certainly
be a good hint at what reviewers can look at when doing reviews.
My fear right now with these guidelines is that these will turn to be the
ultimate criteria to +1/-1 a source package and people will not check if a
On Nov 12, 2007 9:33 PM, Scott Kitterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:13:45 -0600 "Justin Dugger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >It sounds like it sort of solves much of both problems.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean. I think it makes patch systems even more
> critical becau
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:13:45 -0600 "Justin Dugger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Nov 12, 2007 4:34 PM, Emmet Hikory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Emmet Hikory wrote:
>> 1:
http://kitenet.net/~joey/blog/entry/dpatch_dbs_etc_etc_etc_etc_considered_harmful/
>
>On a longer term basis, did any progre
Justin Dugger wrote:
> On Nov 12, 2007 4:34 PM, Emmet Hikory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Emmet Hikory wrote:
>> 1:
>> http://kitenet.net/~joey/blog/entry/dpatch_dbs_etc_etc_etc_etc_considered_harmful/
>>
>
> On a longer term basis, did any progress come out of UDS-Boston on
> moving
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:30:16 +0100 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Emmet Hikory wrote:
>> Reviewers and Packagers,
>>
>> At the recent MOTU Meeting, a set of guidelines for new package
>> review was reviewed. This list is meant to supplement reviewers base
>> opinions when
On Nov 12, 2007 4:34 PM, Emmet Hikory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Emmet Hikory wrote:
> 1:
> http://kitenet.net/~joey/blog/entry/dpatch_dbs_etc_etc_etc_etc_considered_harmful/
On a longer term basis, did any progress come out of UDS-Boston on
moving the entire archive in bazaar?
It sounds like i
Emmet Hikory wrote:
> At the recent MOTU Meeting, a set of guidelines for new package
> review was reviewed. This list is meant to supplement reviewers base
> opinions when reviewing packages, and provide for a relatively stable
> set of criteria when packagers are deciding if their packages s
Hi,
Am Montag 12 November 2007 20:38:19 schrieb Jeffrey Ratcliffe:
> On 12/11/2007, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > 4b. Contents of diff.gz should be in debian/. i.e. no inline
> > patching.
>
> Absolutely. Especially if there are patches on patches, anything else
> makes things really ha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/11/2007, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> 4b. Contents of diff.gz should be in debian/. i.e. no inline patching.
Absolutely. Especially if there are patches on patches, anything else
makes things really hard for anybody to follow.
Regards
Emmet Hikory wrote:
> Reviewers and Packagers,
>
> At the recent MOTU Meeting, a set of guidelines for new package
> review was reviewed. This list is meant to supplement reviewers base
> opinions when reviewing packages, and provide for a relatively stable
> set of criteria when packagers ar
Reviewers and Packagers,
At the recent MOTU Meeting, a set of guidelines for new package
review was reviewed. This list is meant to supplement reviewers base
opinions when reviewing packages, and provide for a relatively stable
set of criteria when packagers are deciding if their packages sho
13 matches
Mail list logo
