On 20/11/2008, at 13.26, Sarah Hobbs wrote:
>> The harm has already been done by letting monodevelop into the
>> distribution. Although I would advocate a removal, the next-best
>> thing
>> is to leave monodevelop at version 1.0
>>
> Morten, this is a packaging list. This is a list for gettin
Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
> Mono is evil software and is a mere trojan carrying a patent bomb from
> Microsoft waiting to explode. Imagine a situation where hundreds of
> essential packages based on Mono exists in Ubuntu, Office apps,
> Internet apps, etc. and Microsoft decides to pull their o
On 19/11/2008, at 17.18, Jo Shields wrote:
> If not, then I feel the best plan is to leave the current (1.0)
> version
> of the package in place.
Mono is evil software and is a mere trojan carrying a patent bomb from
Microsoft waiting to explode. Imagine a situation where hundreds of
essen
On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 13:41 -0500, Nicolas Valcárcel wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 11:22 -0600, Luke L wrote:
> >
> > Mono itself, and the C# compiler, are up-to-date, with CLI 2.0 and C#
> > 3.0.
> This worries me a lot, if the whole mono suit is updated (compilers,
> libraries, etc...) it will
On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 11:22 -0600, Luke L wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Jo Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The "monodevelop" package in Ubuntu has been stuck on the same version
> > for an eternity, and users are (rightly) annoyed at its bugs & lack of
> > features.
On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 11:22 -0600, Luke L wrote:
>
> Mono itself, and the C# compiler, are up-to-date, with CLI 2.0 and C#
> 3.0.
This worries me a lot, if the whole mono suit is updated (compilers,
libraries, etc...) it will break a lot of other tools and recompiling
almost the entire archive wil
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Jo Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The "monodevelop" package in Ubuntu has been stuck on the same version
> for an eternity, and users are (rightly) annoyed at its bugs & lack of
> features. However, we have long been cautioned by upstream not to use
>
Hi,
The "monodevelop" package in Ubuntu has been stuck on the same version
for an eternity, and users are (rightly) annoyed at its bugs & lack of
features. However, we have long been cautioned by upstream not to use
any SVN snapshots or alpha tarballs in a stable release, as they would
become impo
