Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
Mono is evil software and is a mere trojan carrying a patent bomb from
Microsoft waiting to explode. Imagine a situation where hundreds of
essential packages based on Mono exists in Ubuntu, Office apps,
Internet apps, etc. and Microsoft decides to pull their
On 20/11/2008, at 13.26, Sarah Hobbs wrote:
The harm has already been done by letting monodevelop into the
distribution. Although I would advocate a removal, the next-best
thing
is to leave monodevelop at version 1.0
Morten, this is a packaging list. This is a list for getting stuff
Hi,
The monodevelop package in Ubuntu has been stuck on the same version
for an eternity, and users are (rightly) annoyed at its bugs lack of
features. However, we have long been cautioned by upstream not to use
any SVN snapshots or alpha tarballs in a stable release, as they would
become
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Jo Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The monodevelop package in Ubuntu has been stuck on the same version
for an eternity, and users are (rightly) annoyed at its bugs lack of
features. However, we have long been cautioned by upstream not to use
any SVN
On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 11:22 -0600, Luke L wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Jo Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The monodevelop package in Ubuntu has been stuck on the same version
for an eternity, and users are (rightly) annoyed at its bugs lack of
features. However, we
On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 13:41 -0500, Nicolas Valcárcel wrote:
On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 11:22 -0600, Luke L wrote:
Mono itself, and the C# compiler, are up-to-date, with CLI 2.0 and C#
3.0.
This worries me a lot, if the whole mono suit is updated (compilers,
libraries, etc...) it will break a
