Re: [mtasc] Re: MTASC has been forked, perhaps you would like to update?

2009-11-23 Thread Luke Bayes
If anyone can add some of the updates that Ralf Bokelberg introduced, I would be forever in your debt! http://osflash.org/hamtasc lb. -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu

Re: [mtasc] Re: MTASC has been forked, perhaps you would like to update?

2009-11-23 Thread Tristan Schmelcher
I'd be fine with moving to Github if there's interest in further MTASC development. I'll contact the HAMTASC list and see. I've finally gotten around to releasing a source archive on the SF site, and attached the two patches here taken right from svn diff. patch -p0 < FILE should work. (Paul: the

Re: [mtasc] Re: MTASC has been forked, perhaps you would like to update?

2009-11-13 Thread Luke Bayes
I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure Git works fine on Windows. For whatever it's worth, I also vote for Github. Having managed a handful of moderately successful open source projects on Sourceforge over the past 8 years, I've never seen anything close to the quantity or quality of contributions

Re: [mtasc] Re: MTASC has been forked, perhaps you would like to update?

2009-11-13 Thread Luke Bayes
I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure Git works fine on Windows. For whatever it's worth, I also vote for Github. Having managed a handful of moderately successful open source projects on Sourceforge over the past 8 years, I've never seen anything close to the quantity or quality of contributions

Re: MTASC has been forked, perhaps you would like to update?

2009-10-31 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 18:04 +0100, Tristan Schmelcher wrote: > I read over SourceForge's current policy docs and couldn't find any > reference to their old requirement that projects release source > tarballs, so I assumed it was no longer required. The source is all in > SVN of course. I'm not com

Re: MTASC has been forked, perhaps you would like to update?

2009-10-30 Thread Tristan Schmelcher
Thanks for the quick reply, Paul. 2009/10/30 Paul Wise > On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 13:16 +0100, Tristan Schmelcher wrote: > > > I'm just writing to let you know that I recently forked MTASC, the > > Motion-Twin ActionScript 2.0 compiler, which is packaged in both > > Debian and Ubuntu as "mtasc". Mo

MTASC has been forked, perhaps you would like to update?

2009-10-30 Thread Tristan Schmelcher
Hello, I'm just writing to let you know that I recently forked MTASC, the Motion-Twin ActionScript 2.0 compiler, which is packaged in both Debian and Ubuntu as "mtasc". Motion-Twin has ceased development of MTASC and my attempts to get patches submitted fell on deaf ears, so I have made a new site

Re: MTASC has been forked, perhaps you would like to update?

2009-10-30 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 13:16 +0100, Tristan Schmelcher wrote: > I'm just writing to let you know that I recently forked MTASC, the > Motion-Twin ActionScript 2.0 compiler, which is packaged in both > Debian and Ubuntu as "mtasc". Motion-Twin has ceased development of > MTASC and my attempts to get