Re: Minutes for MOTU meeting Feb 29 2008, 12.00 UTC

2008-03-18 Thread Jono Bacon
On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 16:43 +, Matt Zimmerman wrote: I believe the way membership is evolving is that teams with specific areas of responsibility will be able to confer membership. As such, becoming a MOTU could mean simultaneously becoming a member. Since becoming a MOTU already

Re: Minutes for MOTU meeting Feb 29 2008, 12.00 UTC

2008-03-14 Thread Matt Zimmerman
Thanks for sharing these minutes. On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 11:21:44PM +0100, Stefan Potyra wrote: [TOPIC] Should Ubuntu Membership be a general requirement for MOTUship? As noone volunteered to take over the topic, and no particular intentions were shown towards the topic, it was deferred to

Re: Minutes for MOTU meeting Feb 29 2008, 12.00 UTC

2008-03-04 Thread Daniel Holbach
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matthew East schrieb: Just to be clear - Ubuntu Membership is (and I think always has been) a prerequisite for becoming an MOTU. (See http://www.ubuntu.com/community/processes/newdev - Developers must be members ... This is a necessary step for

Re: Minutes for MOTU meeting Feb 29 2008, 12.00 UTC

2008-03-02 Thread Matthew East
Hi, On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Stefan Potyra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Minutes for MOTU meeting Feb 29 2008, 12.00 UTC [1]. {snip} [TOPIC] Should Ubuntu Membership be a general requirement for MOTUship? As noone volunteered to take over the topic, and no particular intentions were

Minutes for MOTU meeting Feb 29 2008, 12.00 UTC

2008-02-29 Thread Stefan Potyra
Minutes for MOTU meeting Feb 29 2008, 12.00 UTC [1]. Meeting Chair: persia People present: 1. persia 2. Hobbsee 3. sistpoty|work 4. mok0 [TOPIC] Should Ubuntu Membership be a general requirement for MOTUship? As noone volunteered to take over the topic, and no particular intentions