Re: Request for review

2012-07-26 Thread Robert Park
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Robert Park wrote: > I'm currently working on unifying as much as possible the 'master' and > 'debian' branches, in the hopes that indeed there can be no patches > and you can just drop the 'debian/' folder into the upstream tarball > and build a package. Ok, so I

Re: Request for review

2012-07-26 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Thursday, July 26, 2012 10:29:02 PM Benjamin Drung wrote: > > > 1) The changelog should only contain entries for version that are > > > actually in the archive. In your case, only one changelog entry would > > > remain. > > > > > > > > But the program has been packaged on a launchpad PPA up unt

Re: Request for review

2012-07-26 Thread Robert Park
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote: >> Yes in theory, however I've been following a few other people's >> request for sponsorship in debian-mentors and it seems nearly >> impossible to get sponsorship during the freeze, because nobody cares >> about new packages and everybody is

Re: Request for review

2012-07-26 Thread Benjamin Drung
Am Donnerstag, den 26.07.2012, 09:06 -0500 schrieb Robert Park: > Quite the thorough review, thank you! You're welcome. > >> Of course, it > >> looks like debian is in freeze, so I guess I'm supposed to pursue > >> acceptance in universe before I'll be able to get it into debian > >> unstable. I

Re: Request for review

2012-07-26 Thread Robert Park
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote: > So your would probably look like: > > version=3 > http://githubredir.debian.net/github/robru/gottengeography (.*).tar.gz Oh, excellent. Thanks! -- http://gottengeography.ca -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.c

Re: Request for review

2012-07-26 Thread Andrew Starr-Bochicchio
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Robert Park wrote: >> 9) You should add a debian/watch file if you release source tarballs. > > Any advice on what a watch file would look like for this github page? > > https://github.com/robru/gottengeography/tags Gunnar Wolf helpfully provides a re-director se

Re: Request for review

2012-07-26 Thread Robert Park
Quite the thorough review, thank you! On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 5:52 AM, Benjamin Drung wrote: > Debian uses -1, -2, and so on for the package revision. Ubuntu appends > ubuntu1, ubuntu2, and so on if they change something in the package. > -0ubuntu1, -0ubuntu2, and so on is used if the package is

Re: Request for review

2012-07-26 Thread Benjamin Drung
Am Sonntag, den 22.07.2012, 19:50 -0500 schrieb Robert Park: > On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Aditya Vaidya wrote: > > Also, just on a side note: I think the version you're submitting to Mentors > > (or wherever in Debian) should be "2.0-1", not "2.0-precise3". > > This is the kind of answer I

Re: Request for review

2012-07-22 Thread Robert Park
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Aditya Vaidya wrote: > Also, just on a side note: I think the version you're submitting to Mentors > (or wherever in Debian) should be "2.0-1", not "2.0-precise3". This is the kind of answer I was looking for, thank you ;-) I knew precise was wrong, but just wasn

Re: Request for review

2012-07-22 Thread Aditya Vaidya
Hello, For the distribution, I think you either put "unstable"/"sid" or "UNRELEASED", though on the Debian Games Team's wiki page, they said they don't accept packages with the distribution "UNRELEASED", though I'm not sure if it applies to all packages. For the most part, Ubuntu package names ar

Re: Request for review

2012-07-22 Thread Robert Park
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Stefano Rivera wrote: > The best reference I can see for that is [0]. Basically, either you mail > the debian-mentors mailing list, asking for someone to sponsor it, or > you file a bug against sponsorship-requests (which achieves the same > thing, but keeps an ope

Re: Request for review

2012-07-22 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi Robert (2012.07.22_02:18:36_+0200) > I also sent an IFP to debian's WNPP but I'm not really sure how to > proceed with the actual getting of the package into debian beyond > that. I'd like some general feedback as it's my first package ever and > it may be a bit rough around the edges. The best

Request for review

2012-07-21 Thread Robert Park
Hi all, I'm a novice packager attempting to put together a package for my GNOME application. I've successfully put together a working package, and pushed it to my PPA here: https://launchpad.net/~gottengeography/+archive/ppa I also sent an IFP to debian's WNPP but I'm not really sure how to proc

Request for review/advocate

2010-02-15 Thread Lorenzo De Liso
Hi, somebody can review/advocate the package autotrash at http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/autotrash ? Thanks, Regards, Lorenzo D. (alias BlackZ). -- Caselle da 1GB, trasmetti allegati fino a 3GB e in piu' IMAP, POP3 e SMTP autenticato? GRATIS solo con Email.it http://www.email.it/f Spons

GlassFish v2 UR1 packages - Request For Review

2008-03-25 Thread Nitya Doraisamy
Hi I have updated GlassFish v2 UR1 packages to address most of the comments raised in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/191658 - The packages now use debconf to interact with the user during installation - The docs have been moved to a seperate package glassfishv2-doc - library dependenci

glassfishv2 packages - request for review

2008-02-27 Thread Nitya Doraisamy
Hi Updated glassfishv2 and dependency packages have been uploaded to REVU Changes: Package name updated as per comments received. Dependency on sun-javadb-core added Removed dependency package sunwderby-v2ur1 as above javadb is now being used. This is to include Project GlassFish V2 UR1

Feature Freeze Exception for glassfishv2ur1 packages - request for review

2008-02-20 Thread Nitya Doraisamy
Hi I have filed a Feature Freeze Exception for glassfishv2ur1 package and it's dependency packages. This is to include Project GlassFish V2 UR1 into Ubuntu. This is the first integration of these package and there are no code diffs against older versions. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193386

Request for review? pmplib

2006-11-16 Thread Richard Bailey
Hello, can someone review (and hopefully advocate) my pmplib package on REVU? http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=3446 - Regards, Richard Bailey -- "Look at their players from big clubs like Juventus and Arsenal and Anderlecht, look at ours from San Juan Jabloteh and New England Revolution..