> >Everyone involved values the community. If you doubt that, we have
> >very serious problems.
>
> Unfortunately, a few minutes after posting the above statement, Stefan
> sent an email to u-m saying he's no longer sure if he wants to be
> involved with Ubuntu Development. I'm not sure if these
> Personally, I'd be happy if there was a commitment to be more mindful of
> working in public when possible in the future.
Sure.
> I suspect that this release cycle will see the archive reorganization in
> place. I have seen indications that the MOTU Council is going to be folded
> into the
> > Let's not bog ourselves down in procedural pedantry. If the CC need to,
> > we can make direct appointments and replacements on any structure in
> > Ubuntu, and will do so.
>
> Thanks, Mark, that's at least a clear announcement, helping me better
> understand how the Ubuntu government works
I think we are going out of focus with this, and i think here are 2
relevant ideas here:
1) This was a MUST rather than an optional desition, speaking from
myself i wouldn't volunteer myself for a position that will be dismissed
in 3 months, and if this was found as a better way from the CC, i'm o
> First off, such an announcement won't reach a large number of developers
> unless sent to e.g. ubuntu-motu or ubuntu-devel (@l.u.c). CC'ing ubuntu-motu
> and keeping the complete original text for reference.
Clearly not. I'm telling you first because that seemed prudent. We
should publicize t
Stefan Potyra [2009-10-31 2:58 +0100]:
> That aside, I find it very interesting and disturbing that membership of
> otherwise voted upon boards are (as it occurs to me from this mail) prolonged
> by the will of one developer.
Well, it wasn't just that. It was discussed on th DMB list, and there
