The build without the lines on productcopy result on this: E/RILD ( 856): dlopen failed: Cannot load library: load_library(linker.cpp:747): library "/system/lib/libsec-ril.so" not found E/RILD ( 859): dlopen failed: Cannot load library: load_library(linker.cpp:747): library "/system/lib/libsec-ril.so" not found E/RILD ( 862): dlopen failed: Cannot load library: load_library(linker.cpp:747): library "/system/lib/libsec-ril.so" not found E/RILD ( 865): dlopen failed: Cannot load library: load_library(linker.cpp:747): library "/system/lib/libsec-ril.so" not found E/RILD ( 868): dlopen failed: Cannot load library: load_library(linker.cpp:747): library "/system/lib/libsec-ril.so" not found
And some on syslog that i did see much: Apr 14 05:35:16 localhost ofonod[424]: create_ril: can't connect to RILD: No such file or directory (2) And the build with only the line commented... E/RILC ( 140): RILD can't accept socket from process root E/RILC ( 140): RILD must accept socket from radio So i don't know what else to do... Does anyone have an ideia? I guess my build is not compile ril and libsec-ril Does libsec ril also compiled on ubuntu touch? or this one i should had removed from the product copy lines? Thanks []'sf.rique On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Henrique Santos Fernandes < sf.ri...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > David Hacker helped me a lot about some stuff. > > It seens my device is not compiling ril and using stubs of coping.. not > sure yet.. > > I am gonna write down what he helped me to do! > > >> I mentioned this earlier in the thread. >> >> Did you examine the source code link I sent you? If so, you'd see the >> log calls that output the lines you saw from logcat: >> >> > Got this on log cat: >> > > E/RILC ( 140): RILD can't accept socket from process root >> > > E/RILC ( 140): RILD must accept socket from radio >> > >> >> > >> These are the lines removed by the patch ( also referenced in my last >> patch ). >> > > Yes, i checked the file and the pacth is applied. > > >> I'm not sure... you did the porting work for this device, correct? If >> so, did you modify any of the AOSP source and/or Android .mk files? >> Just wondering if any changes you made could've affected the application >> of our patches? > > > I did not changed the .mk files or the source i did it after, i will > explain it below. > > I did as it says on the wiki for my device ( i wrote it ) > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/Devices/galaxysbmtd > > > Let's start what i did so far with David Hacker help. > > I ported my device doing adding those to manifest: > > <project name="CyanogenMod/android_device_samsung_galaxysbmtd" > path="device/samsung/galaxysbmtd" remote="github" revision="cm-10.1" /> > <project name="CyanogenMod/android_device_samsung_aries-common" > path="device/samsung/aries-common" remote="github" revision="cm-10.1" /> > <project name="CyanogenMod/android_kernel_samsung_aries" > path="kernel/samsung/aries" remote="github" revision="cm-10.1" /> > <project name="CyanogenMod/android_hardware_samsung" path="hardware/samsung" > remote="github" revision="cm-10.1" /> > > As i told david hacker about this, he saw this on a file called > boardconfigcommom.mk > BOARD_USES_LIBSECRIL_STUB := true > > But at the file vendor/samsung/galaxysbmtd/BoardConfigVendor.mk ( that i > guess overrides the common.mk ) > > I have this: > BOARD_USES_LIBSECRIL_STUB := false > > So i am a bit confused if i am compiling it or just coping the ril. > > He also told me this could be the problem, my device has ril code it seft. > > https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_hardware_samsung/tree/cm-10.1/exynos4/ril > > Another this is that after extracting my proprietarys i also saw this int > this file: vendor/samsung/galaxysbmtd/galaxysbmtd-vendor-blobs.mk > > PRODUCT_COPY_FILES += \ > > vendor/samsung/galaxysbmtd/proprietary/etc/gps.conf:system/etc/gps.conf \ > > vendor/samsung/galaxysbmtd/proprietary/vendor/bin/gpsd:system/vendor/bin/gpsd > \ > > vendor/samsung/galaxysbmtd/proprietary/vendor/etc/gps.xml:system/vendor/etc/gps.xml > \ > vendor/samsung/galaxysbmtd/proprietary/vendor/lib/hw/gps.aries.so: > system/vendor/lib/hw/gps.aries.so \ > * > vendor/samsung/galaxysbmtd/proprietary/lib/libril.so:system/lib/libril.so \ > * > * > vendor/samsung/galaxysbmtd/proprietary/lib/libsecril-client.so:system/lib/libsecril-client.so > \* > * > vendor/samsung/galaxysbmtd/proprietary/lib/libsec-ril.so:system/lib/libsec-ril.so > \* > * vendor/samsung/galaxysbmtd/proprietary/bin/rild:system/bin/rild \* > > vendor/samsung/galaxysbmtd/proprietary/vendor/lib/libsensor_yamaha_test.so:system/vendor/lib/libsensor_yamaha_test.so > \ > > vendor/samsung/galaxysbmtd/proprietary/vendor/bin/orientationd:system/vendor/bin/orientationd > \ > > vendor/samsung/galaxysbmtd/proprietary/vendor/bin/geomagneticd:system/vendor/bin/geomagneticd > \ > vendor/samsung/galaxysbmtd/proprietary/modem.bin:modem.bin > > So o realy don't know what is happening and why i am not getting the > patches... > > I have looked at my compile code an saw this: > > I will translate myself the content > > build/core/Makefile:44: warning: imposing/enforcing commands to target > `/home/sfrique/Ubuntu-Phone/out/target/product/galaxysbmtd/system/lib/libril.so' > build/core/base_rules.mk:502: warning: ignoring old commands to target > `/home/sfrique/Ubuntu-Phone/out/target/product/galaxysbmtd/system/lib/libril.so' > build/core/Makefile:44: warning: imposing commandss to target > `/home/sfrique/Ubuntu-Phone/out/target/product/galaxysbmtd/system/bin/rild' > build/core/base_rules.mk:502: warning: ignoring old commands to target > `/home/sfrique/Ubuntu-Phone/out/target/product/galaxysbmtd/system/bin/rild > > Don't know if this is saying it is compile or not... > > Anyhow, i did two more builds that i have not tested yet. I had no time to > test it. > > One build i just change the variable on common.mk to false. > > And another build i removed those lines that referes to ril stuff on > PRODUCT_COPY_FILES > > So yes there anything else i can do? I will try my builds as soon as i > have time to try debug a bit more. > > But if anyone knows something else i can do i would apreciate. > > And sorry for my english =] > > []'sf.rique > > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Tony Espy <e...@canonical.com> wrote: > >> On 04/11/2013 04:58 PM, Henrique Santos Fernandes wrote: >> > Someone else already told me some pacthes werent applied... i lkooked >> > and it was applied. >> >> I mentioned this earlier in the thread. >> >> Did you examine the source code link I sent you? If so, you'd see the >> log calls that output the lines you saw from logcat: >> >> > Got this on log cat: >> > > E/RILC ( 140): RILD can't accept socket from process root >> > > E/RILC ( 140): RILD must accept socket from radio >> > >> >> > >> These are the lines removed by the patch ( also referenced in my last >> patch ). >> >> > I will remove all my sources and start over with phablet-dev-bootstrap >> > >> > I am syng the new repo right now... and will see whats happens... >> > >> > But how the pacthes cant be applied if if i am using >> > phablet-dev-bootstrap -c ? >> >> I'm not sure... you did the porting work for this device, correct? If >> so, did you modify any of the AOSP source and/or Android .mk files? >> Just wondering if any changes you made could've affected the application >> of our patches? >> >> > Well, i just started to sync from another computer... it shold work >> > right? =] >> > >> > Lets see... >> >> Keep us posted. >> >> /tony >> >> >> >
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
