hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 27.11.2013, 23:08 + schrieb Dmitrijs Ledkovs:
On 27 November 2013 21:58, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote:
hi,
On Mi, 2013-11-27 at 15:41 -0500, David Marceau wrote:
Processing triggers for initramfs-tools ...
update-initramfs: Generating
Hello,
On 26 November 2013 08:58, Sergio Schvezov sergio.schve...@canonical.comwrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Thomi Richards
thomi.richa...@canonical.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Ursula Junque ursi...@ursinha.netwrote:
If upstreams don't oppose to that, bugs
On 27 November 2013 13:06, Ursula Junque ursi...@ursinha.net wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:33 AM, Michał Sawicz
michal.saw...@canonical.com wrote:
On 26.11.2013 02:44, Ursula Junque wrote:
If upstreams don't oppose to that, bugs should only be filed against
Ubuntu packages,
Hi,
As some might have noticed we recently had a few bad image releases into
the Trusty channel that contained regressions.
We also tested out some changes to the build policies of the proposed
images that I would like to establish further.
Within the last weeks we raised the amount of built
On 11/27/2013 04:58 PM, Oliver Grawert wrote:
hi, On Mi, 2013-11-27 at 15:41 -0500, David Marceau wrote:
Processing triggers for initramfs-tools ... update-initramfs:
Generating /boot/initrd.img-touch
...
Writing Boot Image /dev/disk/by-name/boot Press Return to
continue.
while it is
On 28/11/13 12:13, Oliver Grawert wrote:
Hi,
As some might have noticed we recently had a few bad image releases into
the Trusty channel that contained regressions.
We also tested out some changes to the build policies of the proposed
images that I would like to establish further.
Hey guys,
While some part of the world is busy cooking turkey, other are working
and furiously getting new ubuntu touch images out!
We built images 33, 34 and 35!
Those contains some toolkit regression fixes, click packages to get less
failing tests as well as a lot of online accounts bug
hi,
On Do, 2013-11-28 at 17:01 +, Dave Morley wrote:
On 28/11/13 12:13, Oliver Grawert wrote:
Hi,
As some might have noticed we recently had a few bad image releases into
the Trusty channel that contained regressions.
We also tested out some changes to the build policies of the
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 4:13 AM, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote:
My proposal here is to re-enable cron driven builds again.
Yes please!
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 15:32 -0600, Michael Spencer wrote:
I was told by one of the the Ubuntu App Showdown judges that it would
be best to use a page on the page stack instead of sheets. This would
solve your problem, wouldn’t it?
As per the design guides, a page stack should not be used with
The wording is rather confusing, but you can have tabs in a page stack, as long
as the tabs is the first item on the stack. What the designs mean is that you
can’t have a tabs element pushed on top of another page. What they don’t want
is to have a back button on the same screen as a tabs
11 matches
Mail list logo
