On Thursday, June 05, 2014 21:27:36 Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 12:00:23AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > Personally, I'm fine with it being in #ubuntu-release. I think we're
> > already much too fragmented and people are too comfortable in their own
> > corner of the project.
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Ondrej Kubik wrote:
>
> At the moment only security measure involved while installing click package
> is https connection to click store. Click package itself is not signed.
> At the same time even RTM image will have enabled side loading.
>
> This opens potential r
Hi
At the moment only security measure involved while installing click package
is https connection to click store. Click package itself is not signed.
At the same time even RTM image will have enabled side loading.
This opens potential risk that installed application can be "upgraded" with
trojan
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 12:00:23AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Personally, I'm fine with it being in #ubuntu-release. I think we're already
> much too fragmented and people are too comfortable in their own corner of the
> project.
Thanks for the feedback. That was my inclination too, but I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
FYI the music-app still has a lifecycle exception so that would count
to one of the qmlscene processes. (Probably the one with a large
memory usage because of the bug popey mentioned
https://bugs.launchpad.net/music-app/+bug/1289804).
We still have a
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 8:31 PM, Rodney Dawes wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 20:03 +0200, Thomas Voß wrote:
>> Good catch, the more important question is: Why are two apps running
>> in parallel?
>> Our lifecycle policy does not allow for that.
>
> Well, if my understanding of the policy and its im
Hello again,
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Omer Akram
wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 10:05 PM, Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak <
> lukasz.zemc...@canonical.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone!
>>
>> Still no promotions and still more firefighting. This means we are
>> officially entering TRAI
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Николай Шатохин
wrote:
> import QtQuick 2.0
> import QtWebKit 3.0
> import QtWebKit.experimental 1.0
>
> Item {
> width: 640
> height: 480
>
> signal closeWindow();
>
> WebView
> {
> anchors.fill: parent
> url: address
>
On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 20:03 +0200, Thomas Voß wrote:
> Good catch, the more important question is: Why are two apps running
> in parallel?
> Our lifecycle policy does not allow for that.
Well, if my understanding of the policy and its implementation is
correct, then they are stopped/suspend, and s
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Rodney Dawes wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 18:37 +0100, Alan Pope wrote:
>> Here's the only output I managed to grab and paste before it froze:-
>>
>> http://paste.ubuntu.com/7588543/
>
> Not directly related to memory, but why are all the backgrounded apps
> using
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 7:34 AM, Rodney Dawes wrote:
> Can we fix the CI train so that it doesn't reformat multi-line commit
> messages in the MP into a single very long line of very hard to read
> text?
You can accomplish this today by just writing your own
debian/changelog exactly as you want it
Hi!
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 10:05 PM, Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak <
lukasz.zemc...@canonical.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> Still no promotions and still more firefighting. This means we are
> officially entering TRAINCON-0 again meaning: no more blind landings
> happening until we're back to norm
Hello everyone!
Still no promotions and still more firefighting. This means we are
officially entering TRAINCON-0 again meaning: no more blind landings
happening until we're back to normal.
TRAINCON-0 might be a good thing in overall as we have been trying to
recover from some other mischiefs hap
hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 05.06.2014, 15:57 +0300 schrieb Alberto Mardegan:
> On 06/05/2014 03:05 PM, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> > With the current quality of changelog entries people provide to us
> > this is not possible at all. We have to dig into each and every
> > changeset and actually need to unde
Le 30/05/2014 14:49, David Barth a écrit :
This is a heads up for Webapp developers.
We would like to switch all webapps to the Oxide runtime. as soon as
possible.
The webapp-container has switched to Oxide for a few months and the
feedback is generally very good. Oxide is performing much be
On 06/05/2014 10:19 AM, Julien Funk wrote:
> Hey we just had a quick talk about this with Rick and would love to have the
> QA
> team avengers helping out in a systematic way. If we can get some steps to
> reproduce / tools that gather relevant info and steps to report that info --
> we
> can ru
hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 05.06.2014, 08:17 -0700 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> > we discussed these tools at the sprint and I took a TODO home with me to
> > implement proper script wrappers around these tools in the phablet-tools
> > suite (i.e. resulting in phablet-memtest, phablet-powertest etc) so w
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 11:22:25AM +0200, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 04.06.2014, 11:07 -0700 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> > Hi Colin,
> > On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 06:44:08PM +0100, Colin Ian King wrote:
> > > I suggest trying out smemstat which is my in my PPA: ppa:colin-king/white
>
Hey we just had a quick talk about this with Rick and would love to have
the QA team avengers helping out in a systematic way. If we can get some
steps to reproduce / tools that gather relevant info and steps to report
that info -- we can run overnight etc.
Let me know.
~J
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014
On 05/06/14 15:39, Rodney Dawes wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 18:37 +0100, Alan Pope wrote:
>> Here's the only output I managed to grab and paste before it froze:-
>>
>> http://paste.ubuntu.com/7588543/
>
> Not directly related to memory, but why are all the backgrounded apps
> using > 6% CPU? An
hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 05.06.2014, 10:34 -0400 schrieb Rodney Dawes:
> Also, how does one get reasonable changelog entries that follow the
> Debian style? It seems with CI train, we don't get very nice
> debian/changelog entries. For example, for a manual upload to bump the
> Standards-version, a
On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 18:37 +0100, Alan Pope wrote:
> Here's the only output I managed to grab and paste before it froze:-
>
> http://paste.ubuntu.com/7588543/
Not directly related to memory, but why are all the backgrounded apps
using > 6% CPU? And why is Unity8 using almost 40%? What is crashin
On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 14:05 +0200, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> As one of the persons on the landing team who is in charge to nod off
> packaging changes I will from today on *NOT ACK ANY PACKAGING CHANGES*
> that do not:
>
> a) have a descriptive enough changelog entry so that a developer not
> affili
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 6:05 AM, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> As one of the persons on the landing team who is in charge to nod off
> packaging changes I will from today on *NOT ACK ANY PACKAGING CHANGES*
> that do not:
>
> a) have a descriptive enough changelog entry so that a developer not
> affiliat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/05/2014 03:05 PM, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> With the current quality of changelog entries people provide to us
> this is not possible at all. We have to dig into each and every
> changeset and actually need to understand what code changes in
> ther
hi,
Due to new breakage with the upstart-app-launch renaming and thus
(again) massive smoke test breakage we are again close to
TRAINCON-0 ...
During the last days the landing team had to research all this
breakage, for which we would usually just skim over the changelogs on
the utopic-changes
hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 04.06.2014, 11:07 -0700 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> Hi Colin,
>
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 06:44:08PM +0100, Colin Ian King wrote:
>
> > I suggest trying out smemstat which is my in my PPA: ppa:colin-king/white
>
> > see: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~cking/smemstat/
>
> > one can
27 matches
Mail list logo
