Hi,
there was a bug opened for that for which the fix was pending landing,
I uploaded a quick click package update, and some more are pending to
improve the situation for convergence,
https://code.launchpad.net/~abreu-alexandre/webapps-core/ebay/+merge/303148
Stay tuned,
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 a
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 4:15 AM, Mitchell Reese
wrote:
>
> On 20/07/16 18:02, Olivier Tilloy wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 4:08 AM, Mitchell Reese
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> This is working fine in the browser - I'm presented with a dialogue
>>> asking
>>> what I'd like to do - download the file
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Peter Bittner wrote:
> What does that mean? There is no plan to offer (useable) WebRTC
> implementation in webapp-container ever?
>
> With your reference to the the web API you basically say the only way
> is to implement things ourselves using JavaScript, correct
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Ferdinand Holzner <
ferdinandholz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> is it possible to clear the webapp cache, if something goes wrong?
>
> Sometimes i have trouble with the twitter webapp. It crashes and i think
> the only way to resolve this, is to clear the cache.
>
>
it might be this bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/webapps-core/+bug/1457661
that wasn't associated with the webbrowser-app and for which we have a fix
that should land soon,
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 6:23 AM, Olivier Tilloy <
olivier.til...@canonical.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:43 AM,
Hi Peter,
Thank you for your message here,
> So, why doesn't Ubuntu Touch provide and promote something like the
> ogra webapp container [1] as the default for running webapps in order
> to help lazy webapp developers (myself included)? There should really
> be no need to activate an address bar
l is) interfering with localStorage for
> some reason. I thought I had taken it out, but I hadn't. Oops.
>
> Sorry for the noise,
> Robert
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Robert Schroll
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Alexandre Abreu
Hi Robert,
can you provide some context?
I just tested on the vivid image and it works fine,
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Robert Schroll wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is there something you need to do to get localStorage to persist in HTML5
> apps? Values are saved during a session, but they see
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Marc Deslauriers <
marc.deslauri...@canonical.com> wrote:
> On 2015-04-10 06:15 PM, Alan Bell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > there is a somewhat sparsely documented feature of webapps that allow
> you to
> > specify --webappModelSearchPath=. as a parameter of webapp-co
Hi Alan,
as David just said, we indeed have short term plans to move in that
directions. At the moment, any webapp is "shielded" by 3 layers of security
measures:
- the script are not injected in the same js as world as the webpage's
(only share the DOM),
- they are subject to the same CORS, etc.
Hey Alan,
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Alan Bell wrote:
> Hi, and thanks for your help working through this!
>
> I do totally appreciate that the priority is one working theme, I am just
> trying to figure out something sensible to do now, so that things stand a
> fighting chance of working
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Robert Schroll wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 5:04 AM, Alan Bell wrote:
>
>> Apparently it is now best practice to scoop this up and pop it in the
>> click package of the application rather than reference it from the file
>> system, either way, your appli
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 5:15 AM, Olivier Tilloy <
olivier.til...@canonical.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Mitchell Reese
> wrote:
> > Anyway, having followed the instructions from the guide below, and also
> your
> > app example, it doesn't seem to work. Using the browser still
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 6:05 AM, Olivier Tilloy <
olivier.til...@canonical.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Mitchell Reese
> wrote:
> > Hi folks, loving the latest Ubuntu RTM images on my Nexus 4, as well as
> the
> > Nexus 7 vivid builds - exciting to see the direction things are
Hi Lukas,
this is a known issue for a which a fix will land very soon:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/webbrowser-app/+bug/1356417
One way to get back to a running facebook webapp is to remove the file
"session.json" located
in ~/.local/share/com.ubuntu.developer.webapps.webapp-facebook/ on your
phon
Hi Lukas,
this is a known issue for a which a fix will land very soon:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/webbrowser-app/+bug/1356417
One way to get back to a running facebook webapp is to remove the file
"session.json" located
in ~/.local/share/com.ubuntu.developer.webapps.webapp-facebook/ on your
phon
Hi,
There might be a few reasons for that. Are you directly using the
Oxide.WebView or do you use it through the Ubuntu.Web.UbuntuWebView
component?
If you are directly using the Oxide.WebView you might not have set the
dataPath for the WebContext of the Oxide WebView. Unless things have
changed,
Yes the documentation needs to be updated with a note about the additional
argument, (it is interesting to not that it actually applies to ALL command
line UI started apps, not just webapps),
About the misleading warning, Olivier is right, they are misleading and can
be safely ignored. In fact the
Hi,
nothing changed in this area,
which UbuntuTouch image are you using?
Thank you,
On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 3:05 AM, Fabio Colella wrote:
> Since the recent land of Oxide, webapps have started to trow logs like
> that:
>
> webapp-container: unrecognized option '--enable-back-forward'
> webap
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
> As it stands now, two items remain:
>
> 1. low memory killer and/or OOM is called more often with webbrowser-app
> and
>webapp-container using oxide than with qtwebkit
>
> Perhaps '1' it can be fixed with
> some dlopen magic?
>
>
I wou
I thouhgt you might be interested,
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Robert Schroll wrote:
> That might work, but it'd be mildly annoying both to program and to use.
>> I also don't know how to detect whether the user has a physical keyboard,
>> ...
>
>
The runtime-api javascript binding for HTM
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Robert Schroll wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Alexandre Abreu <
> alexandre.ab...@canonical.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Robert Schroll
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Once focus is on the input, th
they are not supported yes w/ the OSK, but you can still make it work by
trapping the 'input' event:
document.querySelector("input").addEventListener('input', function(e) {
console.log(e.target.value); });
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Alexandre Abreu <
&
Hi Robert,
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Robert Schroll wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Robert Schroll
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Alexandre Abreu <
>> alexandre.ab...@canonical.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Robert,
>>&
Hi Robert,
The gist of the issue is OSK not popping up when js sets the focus in a
text field. I dont think that having a way to programatically popup the OSK
w/o a given "target" (text input field, etc.) is sound as a use case for a
given API. It opens the gate for quite a few edge cases and adds
While a programmatic solution might be handy in the meantime, can you have
a text field that can be the receiver for the user's input & with which the
user could trigger the keyboard to popup? you could track down the onchange
events & pick up the currently entered "word"?
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at
Hi Robert,
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Robert Schroll wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to figure out what options I have for storing data in an HTML
> app. Based on testing in 13.10, it appears that Web Storage and Web SQL
> are supported, while IndexedDB are FileSystem are not. Is this co
Hi Ted,
thanks for that!
It might be a little pedantic, but shouldn't we talk about URI instead of
URL?
Besides that a few questions:
- Is APP_ID going to be used in e.g. the proposed URI
application://$(APP_ID).desktop (why specify the ".desktop" btw?), by that
I mean w/ the version included?
28 matches
Mail list logo
