hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 12.03.2014, 23:05 + schrieb Colin Watson:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 06:30:04PM -0300, Ricardo Salveti de Araujo wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Sergio Schvezov
> > wrote:
> > > So instead of 'uninstalling/unregistering' them from the default
> > > image; it wou
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:05:25PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> click unregister --root=/custom --all-users PACKAGE-NAME
This should be --root=/custom/click, not --root=/custom, to match how
the database is declared. I've fixed the documentation in click
accordingly. Sorry for that typo.
--
hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 13.03.2014, 11:12 +0100 schrieb Manuel de la Pena:
>
> This one is temporary:
> - update manager
>
> I might be wrong, but I though that the update manager was already
> added to the system settings as part of the sytem image updates...
> Does an
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 09:39:30PM -0300, Ricardo Salveti de Araujo wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the detailed explanation, really useful (which brings
> a question if this is documented already somewhere).
It wasn't, but I've pushed a lightly-edited version of my brain-dump
here:
https://click.rea
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Sergio Schvezov <
sergio.schve...@canonical.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Rodney Dawes
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-03-12 at 15:37 -0300, Sergio Schvezov wrote:
> >> - this opens the possibility of having a better set for phone and
> >> tablet (diff
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Alex Chiang wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Ricardo Salveti de Araujo
> wrote:
> - the new common rootfs should have no click apps per default
> - the rootfs we know today would be a special case of customization
Can you expand on this?
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 06:30:04PM -0300, Ricardo Salveti de Araujo wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Sergio Schvezov
>> wrote:
>> > So instead of 'uninstalling/unregistering' them from the default
>> > image; it would just not be in
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 06:30:04PM -0300, Ricardo Salveti de Araujo wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Sergio Schvezov
> wrote:
> > So instead of 'uninstalling/unregistering' them from the default
> > image; it would just not be installed.
> >
> > cjwatson mention that this is really not ne
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Sergio Schvezov
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Alex Chiang wrote:
>> I am not against this plan, but I do have a question.
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Sergio Schvezov
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> - the new common rootfs should have no click apps per d
It also solves the problem of an OEM/Carrier not wanting to ship with any
specific apps (i.e. terminal)
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Alex Chiang wrote:
> I am not against this plan, but I do have a question.
>
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Sergio Schvezov
> wrote:
> >
> > - the new c
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Rodney Dawes
wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-03-12 at 15:37 -0300, Sergio Schvezov wrote:
>> - this opens the possibility of having a better set for phone and
>> tablet (different customizations, preinstalled apps that is).
>
> Are the apps where this actually matters curren
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Ricardo Salveti de Araujo
wrote:
>
> Not wanting a terminal by default is what started this conversation :-)
>
> We could only install by default what we think that should be
> mandatory, and provide the rest as part of a default custom tarball.
> That way we can p
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Alex Chiang wrote:
> I am not against this plan, but I do have a question.
>
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Sergio Schvezov
> wrote:
>>
>> - the new common rootfs should have no click apps per default
>> - the rootfs we know today would be a special case of c
On Wed, 2014-03-12 at 15:37 -0300, Sergio Schvezov wrote:
> - this opens the possibility of having a better set for phone and
> tablet (different customizations, preinstalled apps that is).
Are the apps where this actually matters currently, even packaged as
clicks? It doesn't seem like they are.
I am not against this plan, but I do have a question.
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Sergio Schvezov
wrote:
>
> - the new common rootfs should have no click apps per default
> - the rootfs we know today would be a special case of customization
Can you expand on this? Does this mean we would d
cwayne brought up an interesting question on #ubuntu-touch today on
how to provide custom images _without_ specific packages.
This follows the story of common rootfs for everything. After a quick
discussion with rsalveti, ogra, cwayne and pmcgowan (which could be a
red flag :-P), we came to some s
16 matches
Mail list logo
