On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 12:31 AM, Steve Langasek
steve.langa...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 03:43:25PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
it's not about automation or not and as I said before, I am surely not
fighting automation. I am simply against going back from a
potentially-smart,
Hi,
it seems you put a few changes up for discussion in one shot.
Let's keep those separate and look at them one by one:
From what I see you basically propose three main things:
1. lets increase velocity of image production so we get 2-3 images
produced in devel-proposed per day
2. make cron
hi,
On Fr, 2013-11-29 at 11:32 +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
Hi,
it seems you put a few changes up for discussion in one shot.
Let's keep those separate and look at them one by one:
From what I see you basically propose three main things:
1. lets increase velocity of image production
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote:
hi,
On Fr, 2013-11-29 at 11:32 +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
Hi,
it seems you put a few changes up for discussion in one shot.
Let's keep those separate and look at them one by one:
From what I see you basically
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Alexander Sack a...@canonical.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote:
hi,
On Fr, 2013-11-29 at 11:32 +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
Hi,
it seems you put a few changes up for discussion in one shot.
Let's keep those
hi,
On Fr, 2013-11-29 at 13:01 +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote:
hi,
On Fr, 2013-11-29 at 11:32 +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
Hi,
it seems you put a few changes up for discussion in one shot.
Let's keep those separate
hi,
On Fr, 2013-11-29 at 13:22 +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Alexander Sack a...@canonical.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote:
hi,
On Fr, 2013-11-29 at 11:32 +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
Hi,
it seems you
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote:
hi,
On Fr, 2013-11-29 at 13:01 +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote:
hi,
On Fr, 2013-11-29 at 11:32 +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
Hi,
it seems you put a
On Fr, 2013-11-29 at 13:38 +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote:
hi,
On Fr, 2013-11-29 at 13:01 +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote:
hi,
On Fr, 2013-11-29 at
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On Fr, 2013-11-29 at 13:38 +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote:
hi,
On Fr, 2013-11-29 at 13:01 +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 12:41
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Alexander Sack a...@canonical.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote:
hi,
On Fr, 2013-11-29 at 11:32 +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
Hi,
it seems you put a few changes up for discussion in one shot.
Let's
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Ursula Junque ursi...@ursinha.net wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Alexander Sack a...@canonical.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote:
hi,
On Fr, 2013-11-29 at 11:32 +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Ricardo Salveti de Araujo
ricardo.salv...@canonical.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On Fr, 2013-11-29 at 13:38 +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com
On 29/11/13 14:43, Alexander Sack wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Ricardo Salveti de Araujo
ricardo.salv...@canonical.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On Fr, 2013-11-29 at 13:38 +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013
hi,
On Fr, 2013-11-29 at 15:43 +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
And the archive is always open, besides the landing team syncing the
landings first in a ppa and then in proposed, so we should always have
an automated job that creates such snapshots.
The fact that the archive uploads are in
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Dave Morley davm...@davmor2.co.uk wrote:
On 29/11/13 14:43, Alexander Sack wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Ricardo Salveti de Araujo
ricardo.salv...@canonical.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote:
hi,
On Fr, 2013-11-29 at 15:43 +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
And the archive is always open, besides the landing team syncing the
landings first in a ppa and then in proposed, so we should always have
an automated job
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 4:38 AM, Alexander Sack a...@canonical.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote:
why would it matter at all if an image gets promoted ... in my ideal
world we would have builds triggered every time a change set enters from
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Robert Park robert.p...@canonical.comwrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 4:38 AM, Alexander Sack a...@canonical.com
wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote:
why would it matter at all if an image gets promoted ... in my ideal
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Sergio Schvezov
sergio.schve...@canonical.com wrote:
I'm going to stick to the technical side here.
There's one piece of the infra I don't really know yet (britney and/or
moving from proposed to the archive); I'm going to assume that component is
britney.
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Robert Park robert.p...@canonical.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 4:38 AM, Alexander Sack a...@canonical.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote:
why would it matter at all if an image gets promoted ... in my ideal
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Sergio Schvezov
sergio.schve...@canonical.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Robert Park robert.p...@canonical.com
wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 4:38 AM, Alexander Sack a...@canonical.com
wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Oliver Grawert
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 03:43:25PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
it's not about automation or not and as I said before, I am surely not
fighting automation. I am simply against going back from a
potentially-smart, trigger based approach for one of our CI steps
(image production) to a cronjob
Hi,
As some might have noticed we recently had a few bad image releases into
the Trusty channel that contained regressions.
We also tested out some changes to the build policies of the proposed
images that I would like to establish further.
Within the last weeks we raised the amount of built
On 28/11/13 12:13, Oliver Grawert wrote:
Hi,
As some might have noticed we recently had a few bad image releases into
the Trusty channel that contained regressions.
We also tested out some changes to the build policies of the proposed
images that I would like to establish further.
hi,
On Do, 2013-11-28 at 17:01 +, Dave Morley wrote:
On 28/11/13 12:13, Oliver Grawert wrote:
Hi,
As some might have noticed we recently had a few bad image releases into
the Trusty channel that contained regressions.
We also tested out some changes to the build policies of the
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 4:13 AM, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote:
My proposal here is to re-enable cron driven builds again.
Yes please!
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
27 matches
Mail list logo
