Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Cellular Fail

2014-06-17 Thread Tony Espy
On 06/17/2014 09:53 AM, Rodney Dawes wrote: On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 09:35 -0400, Tony Espy wrote: On 06/16/2014 09:58 AM, Pat McGowan wrote: In my experience No signal shows up when in fact the modem is on and you have no connection. When the modem is off it does not appear, which is what needs f

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Cellular Fail

2014-06-17 Thread Tony Espy
On 06/16/2014 09:58 AM, Pat McGowan wrote: In my experience No signal shows up when in fact the modem is on and you have no connection. When the modem is off it does not appear, which is what needs fixing. There's at least one bug tracking this issue ( ie. no icon to reflect modem offline ):

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Cellular Fail

2014-06-17 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 09:35 -0400, Tony Espy wrote: > On 06/16/2014 09:58 AM, Pat McGowan wrote: > > In my experience No signal shows up when in fact the modem is on and > > you have no connection. > > When the modem is off it does not appear, which is what needs fixing. > > There's at least one b

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Cellular Fail

2014-06-17 Thread Ricardo Salveti de Araujo
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Pat McGowan wrote: > In my experience No signal shows up when in fact the modem is on and > you have no connection. > When the modem is off it does not appear, which is what needs fixing. We currently have an issue with the way we're calculating the bars (icons),

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Cellular Fail

2014-06-16 Thread Pat McGowan
In my experience No signal shows up when in fact the modem is on and you have no connection. When the modem is off it does not appear, which is what needs fixing. Pat On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Sam Bull wrote: > On ven, 2014-06-13 at 14:33 +0100, Sam Bull wrote: >> Edit: Just retested it t

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Cellular Fail

2014-06-14 Thread Sam Bull
On ven, 2014-06-13 at 14:33 +0100, Sam Bull wrote: > Edit: Just retested it to see if this had changed recently. The 'No > signal' has been swapped for the 0 bars icon as you've suggested, but > it's also still used for a weak signal too. So, there is actually no way > to distinguish between low si

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Cellular Fail

2014-06-13 Thread Tony Espy
On 06/13/2014 08:52 AM, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sam Bull wrote on 07/06/14 22:57: ... So, in my house I have really bad signal, so it looked normal that the network indicator showed the 0 bars icon, for a really weak signal. But, when I tried to

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Cellular Fail

2014-06-13 Thread Sam Bull
On ven, 2014-06-13 at 13:52 +0100, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote: > You're right, this is a mistake in the design. Just showing zero bars > is not enough to indicate that you have no signal, regardless of what > the cause is. Yep, but 0 bars is actually used to indicate that you DO have a signal under

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Cellular Fail

2014-06-13 Thread Matthew Paul Thomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sam Bull wrote on 07/06/14 22:57: > ... > > So, in my house I have really bad signal, so it looked normal that > the network indicator showed the 0 bars icon, for a really weak > signal. But, when I tried to send a text message, it became > apparen

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Cellular Fail

2014-06-13 Thread Fabian Herb
Am 13.06.2014 10:03, schrieb Alfonso Sanchez-Beato: On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Fabian Herb > wrote: On 08 Jun 2014, at 14:57, Riccardo Padovani mailto:ricca...@rpadovani.com>> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 01:16:12PM +0200, Alfonso Sanchez-Be

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Cellular Fail

2014-06-13 Thread Alfonso Sanchez-Beato
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Fabian Herb wrote: > > On 08 Jun 2014, at 14:57, Riccardo Padovani > wrote: > > > On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 01:16:12PM +0200, Alfonso Sanchez-Beato wrote: > >>> With no real knowledge of the system, my first guess is that something > >>> has failed to run the cellu

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Cellular Fail

2014-06-13 Thread Fabian Herb
On 08 Jun 2014, at 14:57, Riccardo Padovani wrote: > On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 01:16:12PM +0200, Alfonso Sanchez-Beato wrote: >>> With no real knowledge of the system, my first guess is that something >>> has failed to run the cellular stuff entirely, perhaps failing to >>> initialise the gsm mode

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Cellular Fail

2014-06-08 Thread Sam Bull
On dim, 2014-06-08 at 13:16 +0200, Alfonso Sanchez-Beato wrote: > > With no real knowledge of the system, my first guess is that > something > has failed to run the cellular stuff entirely, perhaps failing > to > initialise the gsm modem? > > This w

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Cellular Fail

2014-06-08 Thread Riccardo Padovani
On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 01:16:12PM +0200, Alfonso Sanchez-Beato wrote: > > With no real knowledge of the system, my first guess is that something > > has failed to run the cellular stuff entirely, perhaps failing to > > initialise the gsm modem? > > This was an issue that appeared intermittently d

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Cellular Fail

2014-06-08 Thread Alfonso Sanchez-Beato
> > > With no real knowledge of the system, my first guess is that something > has failed to run the cellular stuff entirely, perhaps failing to > initialise the gsm modem? > This was an issue that appeared intermittently due to a bug in urfkill. Utopic image #71 should solve this. > If this kin

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Cellular Fail

2014-06-07 Thread Fabian Herb
I have exactly the same problem. It started between monday and wednesday (I did no image upgrade between working and failing state). I couldn't push the "send"-button in the messaging app, I have zero bars, system settings shows "n.a." as carrier. After a reboot I had no network indicator cellul

[Ubuntu-phone] Cellular Fail

2014-06-07 Thread Sam Bull
Today, I'm really irritated that I missed an event which was caused by Ubuntu seemingly deciding that it was not going to do any cellular activities for the whole day, and then just pretending that everything was fine. Due to this I failed to receive calls and text messages, and only this evening w