On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 4:16 AM, Leo Arias wrote:
>> Do we have a list of AP results giving us a forecast what happens if
>> if we drop the qt 5.2 into the current image?
>
> Timo has been running the tests, updating the results and reporting bugs
> here:
> https://docs.google.com/a/canonical.com/
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Alexander Sack wrote:
> Do we have a list of AP results giving us a forecast what happens if
> if we drop the qt 5.2 into the current image?
>
Timo has been running the tests, updating the results and reporting bugs
here:
https://docs.google.com/a/canonical.com/s
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Timo Jyrinki
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Daniel Holbach
> wrote:
>> With the project almost ready to land, could we relax the "no regressions"
>> policy for this particular landing?
>
> I agree with your rationale and a part of me would like to see "
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Daniel Holbach
wrote:
> With the project almost ready to land, could we relax the "no regressions"
> policy for this particular landing?
I agree with your rationale and a part of me would like to see "bite
the bullet", but there are several enough reasons to not d
Great work Timo!
On 12.02.2014 14:14, Timo Jyrinki wrote:
- I've filed FFe for Qt 5.2(.1) at http://pad.lv/1278329 since it's
not possible to get everything done by the timeframe. This is because
of our "images are always flawless" / "no regressions" development
methods, making this transition a
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Daniel Holbach
wrote:
> On 28.01.2014 10:05, Timo Jyrinki wrote:
>> Testing, fixing and bug filing is very much needed to get everything
>> top-notch! Use the 'qt5.2' tag for bugs
>> (https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/+bugs?field.tag=qt5.2)
>>
>> Regarding flashable
Hello,
Timo (and everybody else): fantastic work. This looks it it was/is a
heroic effort indeed.
On 28.01.2014 10:05, Timo Jyrinki wrote:
Testing, fixing and bug filing is very much needed to get everything
top-notch! Use the 'qt5.2' tag for bugs
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/+bugs?field.
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Timo Jyrinki
wrote:
> https://launchpad.net/~canonical-qt5-edgers/+archive/qt5-beta2/+packages
> build wise. A couple of key packages still have problems, so I'd like
> to highlight the following bugs after which I believe there'd be a
> good chance of building Qt
It's now possible to test drive Qt 5.2 on Ubuntu 14.04 (trusty)
desktop without removal of too many packages: sudo apt-add-repository
ppa:canonical-qt5-edgers/qt5-beta2 && sudo apt-get update && sudo
apt-get dist-upgrade - Qt Creator Ubuntu plugin is not there yet
though so you will lose that for n
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Loïc Minier wrote:
>> Qt 5.2 is now at ppa:canonical-qt5-edgers/qt5-beta2 [1] - updates to
>> Qt will come, but for example most synchronizations of packaging with
>> Debian have been done already.
>
> This is not ok; we can't break the apps already in the app stor
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> Only compiled extensions / compiled .so are affected, not pure Qml
> apps as far as I know. And there is ongoing discussions on how to
> provide the backwards compatible stack in parallel to 5.2 stack. It
> started off in vUDS sessions and continue
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013, Timo Jyrinki wrote:
> == Qt 5.2.0 final and library transition, rebuilds needed ==
>
> Qt 5.2 is now at ppa:canonical-qt5-edgers/qt5-beta2 [1] - updates to
> Qt will come, but for example most synchronizations of packaging with
> Debian have been done already.
This is not ok
On 8 January 2014 12:25, Daniel Holbach wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> On 19.12.2013 10:02, Timo Jyrinki wrote:
>>
>> == Qt 5.2.0 final and library transition, rebuilds needed ==
>>
>> Qt 5.2 is now at ppa:canonical-qt5-edgers/qt5-beta2 [1] - updates to
>> Qt will come, but for example most synchronization
Hello,
On 19.12.2013 10:02, Timo Jyrinki wrote:
== Qt 5.2.0 final and library transition, rebuilds needed ==
Qt 5.2 is now at ppa:canonical-qt5-edgers/qt5-beta2 [1] - updates to
Qt will come, but for example most synchronizations of packaging with
Debian have been done already.
[1] https://lau
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Timo Jyrinki
wrote:
> sudo apt-get remove --purge libqt5core5
> sudo apt-get upgrade
> # when possible later on, but currently missing Qt Creator and
> ubuntu-ui-toolkit, make sure you've all of Ubuntu SDK still
> # sudo apt-get install ubuntu-sdk
...which also u
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Timo Jyrinki
wrote:
> Qt 5.2 is now at ppa:canonical-qt5-edgers/qt5-beta2 [1] - updates to
> Qt will come, but for example most synchronizations of packaging with
> Debian have been done already.
>
> [1] https://launchpad.net/~canonical-qt5-edgers/+archive/qt5-bet
Hello,
It is now possible to experiment with final Qt 5.2.0 via PPA and start
fixing bugs related to it. You need to use Ubuntu 14.04 development
version (trusty).
All bug fixes should be made so that the software continues to work
also against Qt 5.0.2 - #ifdef:s etc. as needed. You can see exam
17 matches
Mail list logo
