On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Martin Pitt wrote:
>> If the changes are already in utopic, but we do not expect any further
>> changes on a package, thus it won't get a silo through normal activity,
>> what is the recommended way to get it synced to ubuntu-rtm, as it's
>> clear this won't happen
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> hi,
> Am Mittwoch, den 27.08.2014, 07:27 +0200 schrieb Martin Pitt:
>
>> For the record, "copy-package" from ubuntu-archive-tools can copy a
>> source (with our without binaries) from anywhere to anywhere, in
>> particular from ubuntu to ub
hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 27.08.2014, 07:27 +0200 schrieb Martin Pitt:
> For the record, "copy-package" from ubuntu-archive-tools can copy a
> source (with our without binaries) from anywhere to anywhere, in
> particular from ubuntu to ubuntu-rtm (I did that yesterday with fresh
> langpacks, including
Rodney Dawes [2014-08-26 15:33 -0400]:
> If the changes are already in utopic, but we do not expect any further
> changes on a package, thus it won't get a silo through normal activity,
> what is the recommended way to get it synced to ubuntu-rtm, as it's
> clear this won't happen automatically by
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:33 PM, Rodney Dawes
wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-08-26 at 19:11 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
>> 1. SRCCOPY from utopic silo to RTM silo landing option AVAILABLE
>>
>> This wasn't clearly announced, but has been done successful
On Aug 26, 2014 12:34 PM, "Rodney Dawes"
> If the changes are already in utopic, but we do not expect any further
> changes on a package, thus it won't get a silo through normal activity,
> what is the recommended way to get it synced to ubuntu-rtm, as it's
> clear this won't happen automatically b
On martes 26 de agosto de 2014 16h'33:58 ART, Rodney Dawes wrote:
On Tue, 2014-08-26 at 19:11 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
1. SRCCOPY from utopic silo to RTM silo landing option AVAILABLE
This wasn't clearly announced, but has been done succes
On Tue, 2014-08-26 at 19:11 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> 1. SRCCOPY from utopic silo to RTM silo landing option AVAILABLE
>
> This wasn't clearly announced, but has been done successfully at least
> twice and I think it should eliminate a big c
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Alexander Sack wrote:
> 3. QA sign off for features only
> ===
> One concern was about how we can land all the fixes for all the bugs
> with this QA sign-off burden. This was never planned to be the case,
> but since the TRAINCON-0 rule seem t
Hi all,
Since we branched off last week there has been a good amount of
productive and emotional discussion about the difficulties the ramp up
the new RTM landing process puts on landers and landing team.
After discussing with the wider team and stakeholders, we identified
three key points that w
10 matches
Mail list logo
