We have released a new version to address a blocker issue:
https://developer.ubuntu.com/en/blog/2016/06/28/new-ubuntu-sdk-beta-release3/
cheers,
bzoltan
On 14/06/16 13:38, Zoltán Balogh wrote:
And calling for beta testers
Hi Benjamin,
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 6:31 AM, Benjamin Zeller <
benjamin.zel...@canonical.com> wrote:
> Some more checks you could try:
>
> Log into the container with:
>
> usdk-target exec
>
> there check if
>
> 1. /dev/dri/card0 is accessible for root:video
> 2. Your user is part of the group
awesome, thanks.
On 06/21/2016 09:30 AM, Benjamin Zeller wrote:
Just wanted to add:
They will work outside of the Ubuntu SDK IDE. The IDE itself will no longer
support them so you need to handle them manually.
On 06/21/2016 03:28 PM, knitzsche wrote:
Will this delete existing click chroots
Will this delete existing click chroots automatically?
I (and others) still use these for building (separately from the SDK),
so there needs to be a way to not delete them.
Cheers,
Kyle
On 06/20/2016 03:28 PM, Benjamin Zeller wrote:
2. Is it mandatory to reset qt-creator settings?
No.
Just wanted to add:
They will work outside of the Ubuntu SDK IDE. The IDE itself will no longer
support them so you need to handle them manually.
On 06/21/2016 03:28 PM, knitzsche wrote:
Will this delete existing click chroots automatically?
I (and others) still use these for building
On 06/21/2016 03:28 PM, knitzsche wrote:
Will this delete existing click chroots automatically?
Absolutely not. The click chroots will stay and continue to work.
I (and others) still use these for building (separately from the SDK),
so there needs to be a way to not delete them.
Cheers,
all my projects show this in the sdk
bash: /usr/bin/webapp-container: No such file or directory
Application finished with exit code 127.
but the command is there ?
wayneward@shanghai:~$ /usr/bin/webapp-container
The application has been launched with no explicit or system provided
app id. An
On 06/21/2016 03:07 AM, Felipe De La Puente wrote:
Hi Benjamin,
Thanks a lot for your answers and help!
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Benjamin Zeller
>
wrote:
On 06/20/2016 06:54 PM, Felipe De La Puente wrote:
Hi Benjamin,
Thanks a lot for your answers and help!
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Benjamin Zeller <
benjamin.zel...@canonical.com> wrote:
> On 06/20/2016 06:54 PM, Felipe De La Puente wrote:
>
> Hi Zoltan,
>
> I gave the new sdk-ide a little try. I created a container for
>
On 06/20/2016 06:54 PM, Felipe De La Puente wrote:
Hi Zoltan,
I gave the new sdk-ide a little try. I created a container for
16.04-amd64-desktop, when I tried to build my existing projects, they
failed not finding the qmake .pro file. Didn't have time to dig into
the problem yet...
Some
Hi Zoltan,
I gave the new sdk-ide a little try. I created a container for
16.04-amd64-desktop, when I tried to build my existing projects, they
failed not finding the qmake .pro file. Didn't have time to dig into the
problem yet...
Some questions:
1. Is the change backwards compatible with
This sounds really, really great. I have a very very limited
experience with the SDK/IDE (just trying some things around) but
already encountered basically all the issues described in the preface.
Good job.
On 14 June 2016 at 13:38, Zoltán Balogh wrote:
> And calling
And calling for beta testers
https://developer.ubuntu.com/en/blog/2016/06/14/calling-testers-new-ubuntu-sdk-ide-post/
cheers,
bzoltan
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
More help
13 matches
Mail list logo