On 06/20/2016 02:16 AM, Benjamin Zeller wrote:
> What I wonder: Do you create arm or i386 based emulators?
> Only the i386 ones work properly.
Following up one more time on i386 emulator. It boots! The SDK is unable
to "autocreate" the kit for it (process completes without errors, but
still no k
On 06/21/2016 12:16 AM, Benjamin Zeller wrote:
> Hm can you check if virtualization support is enabled in your BIOS? I
> think someone once had a similar issue with that.
For posterity, my CPU (skylake i7) supports virtualization, Intel's
VT/VT-d, and it's enabled in BIOS.
--
Mailing list: http
Dont think you will get a kvm running
but maybe a virtualbox
WayneOn Tue, 2016-06-21 at 12:41 +0200, Bertrand CHEVRIER wrote:
> Running
> $> kvm-ok
> INFO: Your CPU does not support KVM extensions
> KVM acceleration can NOT be used
>
> And after checking my cpu (Intel P7450) doesn't support
Running
$> kvm-ok
INFO: Your CPU does not support KVM extensions
KVM acceleration can NOT be used
And after checking my cpu (Intel P7450) doesn't support hardware
visualization (
http://ark.intel.com/products/36734/Intel-Core2-Duo-Processor-P7450-3M-Cache-2_13-GHz-1066-MHz-FSB
)
So it means I can
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/phablet-tools/+bug/1594685
2016-06-21 8:42 GMT+02:00 Bertrand CHEVRIER :
> I'm also still stuck with the emulator, having created a new one using the
> command line :
>
> > sudo ubuntu-emulator create --channel=ubuntu-touch/stable myinstance
>
> then runn
Hm can you check if virtualization support is enabled in your BIOS? I
think someone once had a similar issue with that.
On 06/21/2016 08:42 AM, Bertrand CHEVRIER wrote:
I'm also still stuck with the emulator, having created a new one using
the command line :
> sudo ubuntu-emulator create --ch
On 06/20/2016 09:25 AM, Benjamin Zeller wrote:
> At least the SDK IDE would always suggest you to create a i386/stable
> emulator as default.
As seen in this blog post
https://developer.ubuntu.com/en/blog/2016/06/14/calling-testers-new-ubuntu-sdk-ide-post/
it doesn't suggest one way or the othe
On 06/20/2016 05:07 PM, Unix One wrote:
On 06/20/2016 02:16 AM, Benjamin Zeller wrote:
What I wonder: Do you create arm or i386 based emulators?
Only the i386 ones work properly.
Hello! That's great information to have. Are you saying we shouldn't
expect armhf (which is the default) emulators t
On 06/20/2016 02:16 AM, Benjamin Zeller wrote:
> What I wonder: Do you create arm or i386 based emulators?
> Only the i386 ones work properly.
Hello! That's great information to have. Are you saying we shouldn't
expect armhf (which is the default) emulators to work at all? If so,
this would have
On 06/20/2016 02:13 AM, Andrea Bernabei wrote:
> I somehow missed you tried development and stable channels already.
> It seems to work here with the stable channel.
Yes, I did, with the same result.
> I have the same "basename: missing operand" error in the log, so I don't
> think that's critica
On 06/19/2016 11:46 PM, nick luigi eusebio wrote:
> Well that's a suggestion from another developer :)
> It's so much easier doing so and doesn't really affect your phone badly.
> I think it's okay to test only on stable and not yet on rc-proposed.
> Actually the best way for me is to test on a tab
t available though.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *From:* Unix One < un...@live.com>
>>> *To:* nick luigi eusebio < kugi_...@yahoo.com>;
>>> Bertrand CHEVRIER <
>>> chevrier.bertr...@gmail.com>
>&g
;
>>
>> --
>> *From:* Unix One
>> *To:* nick luigi eusebio ; Bertrand CHEVRIER <
>> chevrier.bertr...@gmail.com>
>> *Cc:* "ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net" <
>> ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net>
>> *Sent:
*To:* nick luigi eusebio mailto:kugi_...@yahoo.com>>; Bertrand CHEVRIER
mailto:chevrier.bertr...@gmail.com>>
*Cc:* "ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
<mailto:ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net>"
mailto:ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net>>
*Sent:* Monda
ble though.
>
>
> --
> *From:* Unix One
> *To:* nick luigi eusebio ; Bertrand CHEVRIER <
> chevrier.bertr...@gmail.com>
> *Cc:* "ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net" >
> *Sent:* Monday, June 20, 2016 8:31 AM
>
> *Subject:* Re:
On 06/19/2016 02:46 AM, nick luigi eusebio wrote:
> You should use your phone for testing.
Should the developer documentation say that then? Because it's currently
recommending using emulators.
Also, even if a developer has a device for testing, they might want to
test on stable, as well as dev
n it and even use in windowed mode
without the need of an external display.I guess there's no tablet emulator yet
available though.
From: Unix One
To: nick luigi eusebio ; Bertrand CHEVRIER
Cc: "ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net"
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 8:31 AM
S
On 06/19/2016 02:43 AM, Bertrand CHEVRIER wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think I'm in the same situation, the emulators just don't start after
> eating all my CPU for a while.
> I thought it was because of my limited hardware on vivid, but with your
> message it seems it's in the emulators themselves.
>
> It's
ubject: Re: [Ubuntu-phone] basename: missing operand
Hi,
I think I'm in the same situation, the emulators just don't start after eating
all my CPU for a while.
I thought it was because of my limited hardware on vivid, but with your message
it seems it's in the emulators them
Hi,
I think I'm in the same situation, the emulators just don't start after
eating all my CPU for a while.
I thought it was because of my limited hardware on vivid, but with your
message it seems it's in the emulators themselves.
It's really an issue for an app developers, for now I'm testing my
Hello,
Has no one else encountered this, am I missing something obvious, or
maybe I didn't provide enough details, or maybe this isn't the right
list to ask this question?
Here are some more details just in case:
- the host is 16.04 fresh install
- hardware: Dell XPS 13 9350 with Intel HD graph
Hello,
I'm new to Ubuntu Touch development and setting up the SDK, and I feel a
bit dumb unable to get the emulator to launch successfully. It starts
with the new window, and after few minutes hangs consuming 100% of a CPU
core, with these last few lines in the log:
[ 54.54] systemd-logi
22 matches
Mail list logo
