Hello Brian! shotwell is in quite a good shape since every bug is triaged by shotwell developers themselves. appmenu-gtk does not have too many bugs or anything serious except for some compatibility issues. gabble have a very few bugs reported half of which are not-so-serious crash reports. so I think this method of evaluation is not accurate.
So this On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 2:22 AM, Brian Murray <br...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > As we all know there are a lot of packages and bugs to keep track of in > Ubuntu. One idea that occurred to me recently, to help identify > packages in need of triage, was to calculate an average bug heat for the > particular package. I've made a first pass at this using all the > packages in the ubuntu-desktop package set. Here are the top 10 > packages: > > usb-modeswitch-data - median: 764, mode: 1448 > language-pack-gnome-fa-base - median: 408, mode: 408 > language-pack-gnome-pt - median: 318, mode: 318 > couchdb-glib - median: 210, mode: 210 > netbook-meta - median: 145, mode: 408 > pyopenssl - median: 136, mode: 259 > shotwell - median: 124, mode: 6 > appmenu-gtk - median: 122, mode: 408 > gnome-python-extras - median: 114, mode: 3 > telepathy-gabble - median: 104, mode: 49 > > As I ran this last Friday there might be some variance in the numbers. > I'm curious whether or not you think the bug reports for these packages > really need reviewing. > > Thanks, > -- > Brian Murray > Ubuntu Bug Master > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAkzq3w4ACgkQDTAwc5ER+zU3zACeO+aWwr65ZVv4FkP+L+JXxnOs > B9AAnAicnS8NSdoLeIyrcWR7NIMkzX7J > =QwSK > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -- > Ubuntu-bugsquad mailing list > ubuntu-bugsq...@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugsquad > >
-- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
