* Zygmunt Krynicki [2010-11-12 00:02 +0100]:
> W dniu 03.11.2010 17:22, Marc Tardif pisze:
[snip]
> > My question is: can we make any reasonable assumptions about the tests
> > that were not run? This can be a matter of opinion where one extreme
> > might not make any assumptions at all, whereas a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
W dniu 03.11.2010 17:22, Marc Tardif pisze:
> Hi folks,
>
> I would appreciate your feedback about interpreting test results across
> multiple test runs. For example, consider the following test results for
> the first test run of a given project:
>
On 11/03/2010 12:22 PM, Marc Tardif wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I would appreciate your feedback about interpreting test results across
> multiple test runs. For example, consider the following test results for
> the first test run of a given project:
>
>test1: Pass
>test2: Pass
>test3: Fail
Hi folks,
I would appreciate your feedback about interpreting test results across
multiple test runs. For example, consider the following test results for
the first test run of a given project:
test1: Pass
test2: Pass
test3: Fail
Then, consider the following partial test results for a seco
