On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
> My main issue with removing the alternate install is the ability to do a
> command-line install, which similar to our servers provides an extra degree
> of security and the ability to do the following as troubleshooting steps
> without a gui:
>
- Original Message -------- Subject: Proposal to drop Ubuntu
> alternate CDs for 12.10 Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:50:24 -0700 From: Steve
> LangasekTo:
> ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
>
> Dear developers,
>
> As part of ongoing efforts to reduce the number of images we s
Hi,
On 28 August 2012 18:50, Brendan Donegan wrote:
> Andrea, this is a good point. Please read through the discussion that
> has taken place already to see if any of your concerns are addressed,
I'm trying to read any message about this topic, but the discussion
splitted into many topics (netbo
Ah I actually started to think of a point... Ubiquity always has problems
sometimes. These few days it has become more unstable then before. I have
never reported a bug in the ISO QA Tracker, but jsut these few days I
reported 2. Not good.
2012/8/29 Karl Anliot
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:14 AM
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Nicholas Skaggs
wrote:
> On 08/28/2012 09:34 AM, Anthony Byrne wrote:
>>
>> I agree with A. Grandi! The alternate installer is *much* more stable
>> than any live CD. And what about SSH installation?
>>
>> I second the community vote idea, as well. The other *bunt
Le 08/28/2012 09:10 AM, Lance a écrit :
> I'd think both Lubuntu and Xubuntu will suffer from this greatly since
> we do tend to target older low end computers.
Just to make it clear, Lubuntu will keep alternate for 12.10.
Regards,
Julien Lavergne
--
Ubuntu-qa mailing list
Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu
On 28/08/12 16:21, a.gra...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 28 August 2012 18:14, Nicholas Skaggs
> wrote:
>> On 08/28/2012 09:34 AM, Anthony Byrne wrote:
>> As Brendan said, I would encourage those of you who have concerns to post
>> them back to the ubuntu-devel list @ Steve et la for discussion.
Hi,
On 28 August 2012 18:14, Nicholas Skaggs wrote:
> On 08/28/2012 09:34 AM, Anthony Byrne wrote:
> As Brendan said, I would encourage those of you who have concerns to post
> them back to the ubuntu-devel list @ Steve et la for discussion. If you
> remember back to UDS, the original idea as dis
On 08/28/2012 09:34 AM, Anthony Byrne wrote:
I agree with A. Grandi! The alternate installer is *much* more stable
than any live CD. And what about SSH installation?
I second the community vote idea, as well. The other *buntus are very
likely to follow suit, so I believe in at least giving the p
I agree with A. Grandi! The alternate installer is *much* more stable
than any live CD. And what about SSH installation?
I second the community vote idea, as well. The other *buntus are very
likely to follow suit, so I believe in at least giving the public a
heads-up.
--
A. Byrne
On Aug 28, 2012
On 28/08/12 05:22, a.gra...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 28 August 2012 07:04, Nicholas Skaggs
> wrote:
>> FYI -- as spoken of earlier, here's the details on dropping the alternate
>> installer in 12.10. Again, this is just for ubuntu, and not a decision for
>> any flavors. As far as I know, no
Hi,
On 28 August 2012 07:04, Nicholas Skaggs wrote:
>
> FYI -- as spoken of earlier, here's the details on dropping the alternate
> installer in 12.10. Again, this is just for ubuntu, and not a decision for
> any flavors. As far as I know, no flavors have committed to dropping the
> alternate cd'
milestone, which is Beta 1. As part of this, we'll need to migrate the
alternate testcases and add new testcases in support of the new features
in ubiquity. Thanks!
Nicholas
Original Message
Subject: Proposal to drop Ubuntu alternate CDs for 12.10
Date: Mon, 27 Au
13 matches
Mail list logo
