Re: Please, review this Bugs Importances draft

2014-10-12 Thread Elfy
On 12/10/14 15:53, C de-Avillez wrote: [snip] YES, it is misrouted: BugSquad is responsible for keeping the triage pages. By not addressing the BugSquad, you may be missing some interested people. Surely people should join mailing lists that are of interest to them ;) Down that road - everyone

Re: Please, review this Bugs Importances draft

2014-10-12 Thread Alberto Salvia Novella
C de-Avillez: Right now, the Yes/No ratio (to Alberto's question) is at around 60/40. Then, for the moment, I'll be writing to both of them. C de-Avillez: > Perhaps it is time to consider joining more of BugSquad to Quality. It looks appropriate to me, because now they are sharing functions.

Re: Please, review this Bugs Importances draft

2014-10-12 Thread C de-Avillez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 11/10/14 21:10, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: > Thomas Ward: >> Why are you posting this on the QA list instead of the bugsquad >> list? > > Because I thought the Bug-Squad team had joined the Quality team a > long time ago, and was listed in La

Re: How can we figure out if a package is core or not?

2014-10-12 Thread Javier Lopez
On 11/10/14 at 01:42am, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: > Thomas Ward: > >Running `apt-cache > >show pff-tools` actually shows the information even though the package > >is not installed. > > Yes, but it doesn't show if there's a task related with the package. > So it doesn't help figuring out if th