I'll ask the -release team about it tomorrow, I think it needs a tweak in
ubiquity to allow the 'M' processor and I'm not sure if they have
previously looked into it and decided against it.
Regards,
Phill.
On 14 March 2013 17:22, Nio Wiklund wrote:
> Is there a way to send this task to a deve
Is there a way to send this task to a developer, who would know
1. where that test is done (the source code)
2. how to do it (or pass the code to someone less skilled, but enough
skilled to compile and try out a snippet with that particular test on
various computers).
If it is plain C or a bash
Well...I assume its in assembly or CSomething and I know neither of
those languages
Sent from my iPad
On Mar 14, 2013, at 7:37 AM, Nio Wiklund wrote:
> I was thinking about how to report a bug: what details to check out and
> explain.
>
> I think I understand what you want to do, and I think it
I was thinking about how to report a bug: what details to check out and
explain.
I think I understand what you want to do, and I think it will be
possible, but, well, I've retired from programming. Nowadays I'm helping
and testing. So I don't know where and how that check should be changed.
But w
We were just looking at how to possibly fix the CD loader to not require 7bit
Like:
If Pentium M {
Skip PAE Check
} Else If (PAE=1) {
boot();
} Else {
paeErrorBoot();
}
Sorry O only knew how to write that out in java :)
Sent from my iPad
On Mar 14, 2013, at 1:17 AM, Nio Wiklund
Hi Phill,
I have an IBM Thinkpad T42 with a non-pae Pentium M, that accepts 7bit's
fake-pae. What do you need? Please specify in detail, and I'll try to do
it :-)
Nio alias sudodus
On 2013-03-13 02:45, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> Hi alex,
>
> I do not have enough information to ask the developers
Hi alex,
I do not have enough information to ask the developers about your problem.
We really do need a bug filing as per my earlier email to you.
Regards,
Phill.
On 12 March 2013 14:15, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> Oooch!
>
> You can always grab a non-pae version and install that so that the mac
Oooch!
You can always grab a non-pae version and install that so that the machine
has a (u)buntu running. Lubuntu were still certainly releasing non-pae
versions up to 12.04 *i386 *[1] which should install on that machine.
Regards,
Phill.
1. http://cdimages.ubuntu.com/lubuntu/releases/precise/re
Hi Alex,
Have you got a version of ubuntu installed onto that computer?
Regards,
Phill.
On 12 March 2013 13:38, Alex Janko wrote:
> Being a noob...how do I do that exactly...link?
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Mar 12, 2013, at 9:36 AM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> would you please
Hi Alex,
would you please raise a bug against ubiquity, open a terminal session and
issue:
ubuntu-bug ubiquity
from the pentium M machine, I'm not too sure what the team can do about it
if the machine does not advertise it, but it will allow them to have a
think.
Regards,
Phill.
On 12 March 2
Hmm...I also notice that there is an issue with Pentium M models...they
have PAE but yet don't advertise it...is there any way to allow the PAE
ISOs to boot on Pentium M computers?
I've been told it had to do with the boot check, not an actual failed boot
Sent from my iPad
On Mar 12, 2013, at 8:
Hi Lars,
well spotted I thought the list of testing was a bit shorter, but
didn't spot why Any ways,
12:00:20) phillw: Hi folks, has AMD64+Mac been dropped from the ISO's?
> (12:06:37) cjwatson: phillw: No change there
> (12:07:05) ***cjwatson fixes bug 1153992 and tries to work out what
12 matches
Mail list logo
