Re: [Ubuntu-bugcontrol] Why not triaging confirmed bugs instead of new ones?

2014-07-20 Thread Brian Murray
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 02:23:12AM +0200, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: > Daniel Letzeisen: > > Are you saying that bug control members should focus on confirmed > > bugs and leave new bugs to other bug squad members? > > Answered in my previous mail, sent at the same time I was receiving > this o

Re: [Ubuntu-bugcontrol] Why not triaging confirmed bugs instead of new ones?

2014-07-20 Thread Brian Murray
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 12:53:43AM +0200, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: > In the triage guide (http://tinyurl.com/kz4netu) there's a list for > suggested bugs for being triaged, which basically is one of reports > being untouched and not confirmed. Its rather confusing but "triaging" is a process

Re: [Ubuntu-bugcontrol] Why not triaging confirmed bugs instead of new ones?

2014-07-20 Thread Alberto Salvia Novella
Daniel Letzeisen: some 'New' bugs can go directly to triaged The question is what happens when they can't, what is usual: they stay shorted in the list on a pile till someone confirms them, making the triaging difficult. Daniel Letzeisen: > such as requests for packaging/upgrading Since t