On Sat, 2013-11-30 at 10:46 -0500, cprofitt wrote:
I just want to make sure that I understand the summary of what is being
discussed with Michal.
The Unity8 team currently is not getting notification on bugs, nor do
they have the rights to triage, etc. bug related to Unity.
Is that
On 27.11.2013 23:09, Luke Faraone wrote:
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugControl#Requirements_for_Teams
Yeah, exactly. There's a lot of requireds and musts there, that I'm
not comfortable to comply with/enforce for my team just for the sake of
us being able to triage bugs for the few
Hi Michał,
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:33:00AM +0100, Michał Sawicz wrote:
On 26.11.2013 02:44, Ursula Junque wrote:
If upstreams don't oppose to that, bugs should only be filed against
Ubuntu packages, discouraging the direct upstream reporting. Once we
have an agreement, we need to document
On 27 November 2013 13:06, Ursula Junque ursi...@ursinha.net wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:33 AM, Michał Sawicz
michal.saw...@canonical.com wrote:
On 26.11.2013 02:44, Ursula Junque wrote:
If upstreams don't oppose to that, bugs should only be filed against
Ubuntu packages,
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:33 AM, Michał Sawicz
michal.saw...@canonical.comwrote:
On 26.11.2013 02:44, Ursula Junque wrote:
If upstreams don't oppose to that, bugs should only be filed against
Ubuntu packages, discouraging the direct upstream reporting. Once we
have an agreement, we need to
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Ursula Junque ursi...@ursinha.net wrote:
If upstreams don't oppose to that, bugs should only be filed against
Ubuntu packages, discouraging the direct upstream reporting.
I think the distinction between upstream and distro is a useful one, and
I'd be
I started a wiki page to document this information [1]. There's an old page
[2] that probably should be revisited and merged with this one.
While this isn't settled, I'd like to ask people that file bugs to add a
tag referring to the image version where the issue was found, e.g. bug
found at
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Michał Sawicz michal.saw...@canonical.com
wrote:
On 26.11.2013 14:54, Ursula Junque wrote:
I started a wiki page to document this information [1]. There's an old
page [2] that probably should be revisited and merged with this one.
While this isn't settled,
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Thomi Richards
thomi.richa...@canonical.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Ursula Junque ursi...@ursinha.net wrote:
If upstreams don't oppose to that, bugs should only be filed against
Ubuntu packages, discouraging the direct upstream
On 26.11.2013 14:54, Ursula Junque wrote:
I started a wiki page to document this information [1]. There's an old
page [2] that probably should be revisited and merged with this one.
While this isn't settled, I'd like to ask people that file bugs to add a
tag referring to the image version where
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Ursula Junque ursi...@ursinha.net wrote:
Hi Thomi,
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Thomi Richards
thomi.richa...@canonical.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Ursula Junque ursi...@ursinha.netwrote:
If upstreams don't oppose to that,
Hello,
On 26 November 2013 08:58, Sergio Schvezov sergio.schve...@canonical.comwrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Thomi Richards
thomi.richa...@canonical.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Ursula Junque ursi...@ursinha.netwrote:
If upstreams don't oppose to that, bugs
Hi all,
There was a long discussion this afternoon on #ubuntu-ci-eng about the
policy to file bugs when dogfooding Ubuntu Touch. We noticed some bugs were
being filed only against upstream projects, and this caused at least one
regression bug to go unnoticed in this latest image. That happened
13 matches
Mail list logo
