== What was done engineering wise? ==
* Planning for 12.06 cycle in progress:
- https://launchpad.net/linaro-ubuntu/+milestone/12.06
- https://launchpad.net/~linaro-foundations/+upcomingwork
* Preliminary look at bootstrapping options for ARMvX
* New kernels for big.LITTLE
== What's abou
Hi Nick,
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 04:50:54PM -0400, Nicholas Skaggs wrote:
> i suppose I have no real horse in this race, but I'll toss in here. It
> seems a bit odd to me to impose any arbitrary number on ourselves for
> release. Rather, we should look at what we feel is important to ship,
> test
Since we're not actually having the release meeting tomorrow, here's our
kernel team status for the week...
Overall status is reported at the first link below. Burn down for
Quantal Alpha-2 is at the second link below. Burndown for the cycle is
at the third link:
* https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kerne
Hi,
Thank you for all your efforts in getting our Alpha 1 milestone out
the door. :)
Just a reminder that since we released a milestone today, we won't be
having a on Friday in #ubuntu-meeting. Please submit your weekly
updates by email, and follow up by email this week.
Upcoming dates:
i suppose I have no real horse in this race, but I'll toss in here. It
seems a bit odd to me to impose any arbitrary number on ourselves for
release. Rather, we should look at what we feel is important to ship,
test and support, and then see if it's within our intended media
targets. If we support
"There either is or is not, that’s the way things are."
- Charles Dickens, Great Expectations
The 12.10 (Quantal Quetzal) Alpha 1 milestone image set "is"
now released. ;)
Pre-releases of Quantal Quetzal are *not* encouraged for anyone
needing a stable system or anyone who is not comfortable
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > I'm personally fine with either 800MB or 750MiB (786MB) as a target for
> this
> > cycle, I just want to make sure we understand our trajectory for future
> > releases and that the limit in quantal makes sense as a point on that
> > trajector
Hi Steve -
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 3:35 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 09:04:00PM -0500, Kate Stewart wrote:
> >Based on the discussions in our meeting last week, and some follow up
> > with various teams, I believe the following is what we'll be aiming at
> > for Alpha 1
