Re: [Kubuntu] Release Meeting 2012-09-14

2012-09-14 Thread Scott Kitterman
Jonathan Riddell wrote: >=== What was done engineering wise? === > > * KDE SC 4.9.1 update > * print-manager review > * ubiquity LVM and LUKS paritioning for KDE frontend > * post beta review meeting > * attica update > * taglib update > >=== What's about to land that might impact the other tea

Re: Upgrade from 12.04 point 0 to 12.04 point 1 via sudo do-release-upgrade

2012-09-14 Thread Jamie Strandboge
On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 14:22 +0100, Jim Gumbley wrote: > Hi, > Hi! Thanks for using Ubuntu. :) FYI, this mailing list is not a support channel and you would likely get more help via other means. That said, I'll answer. > We have a bunch of machines which were installed from the 12.04 point 0 > (r

Re: Upgrade from 12.04 point 0 to 12.04 point 1 via sudo do-release-upgrade

2012-09-14 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
Dear Jim Gumbley, On 14 September 2012 14:22, Jim Gumbley wrote: > Hi, > > We have a bunch of machines which were installed from the 12.04 point 0 > (released May 2012). > > We want to update them to the 12.04 point 1 (released 23rd Aug 2012). > > However when we run sudo do-release-upgrade we ge

[Kubuntu] Release Meeting 2012-09-14

2012-09-14 Thread Jonathan Riddell
=== What was done engineering wise? === * KDE SC 4.9.1 update * print-manager review * ubiquity LVM and LUKS paritioning for KDE frontend * post beta review meeting * attica update * taglib update === What's about to land that might impact the other teams and release as a whole? === === S

Upgrade from 12.04 point 0 to 12.04 point 1 via sudo do-release-upgrade

2012-09-14 Thread Jim Gumbley
Hi, We have a bunch of machines which were installed from the 12.04 point 0 (released May 2012). We want to update them to the 12.04 point 1 (released 23rd Aug 2012). However when we run sudo do-release-upgrade we get a message that no new releases are available. Is this the designed behaviour?

[Foundations] Release Meeting 2012-09-14

2012-09-14 Thread Oliver Grawert
== What was done engineering wise? == * some work on foundations-q-event-based-initramfs * upstart: - wading through kernel code and writing tests both confirm that if a "debugger" re-execs, it retains its debugger status over ptraced children. This behaviour appears not to be documented.

[PS] Release meeting 20012-09-14

2012-09-14 Thread Alan Pope
Week 37/2012 == What was done engineering wise? == * quantal - compiz 0.9.8.2 tagged but not uploaded, pending further testing - Lots of fixes for the next Unity release - Switch to explicit Q branches for Unity and Nux (lp:nux/3.0, lp:unity/6.0) * precise - Unity SRU-2 released (in p

[Linaro] Release Meeting 2012-09-14

2012-09-14 Thread Fathi Boudra
== What was done engineering wise? == * Final planning in progress for Linaro 12.09 cycle: http://launchpad.net/linaro-ubuntu/+milestone/12.09 http://launchpad.net/~linaro-foundations/+upcomingwork * Linaro GCC 4.7 and Linaro GCC 4.6 2012.09 released. * Linaro QEMU 1.2.0 2012.09 released.