Steve Langasek [2014-10-08 13:10 -0700]:
> It has been pointed out that Ubuntu also has an indexer, zeitgeist, which
> apparently doesn't suffer from the same problem.
To clarify: For the most part, zeitgeist only stores access events, i.
e. metadata like "accessed this video at this time". There
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 10:20:23AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 05:42:48PM +0100, Colin Ian King wrote:
> > > Also, what exactly do you mean when you say baloo doesn't "implement
> > > ionice
> > > support"? The 'ionice' tool is part of the base system (util-linux). It
On 14-10-08 01:25 PM, Steve Riley wrote:
> On 2014-10-08 09:36:03 Steve Langasek wrote:
>>
>> I don't think it's at all appropriate for a desktop environment to install a
>> udev rule which changes the kernel scheduler. That's a severe layering
>> violation, and it means that anyone who installs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/10/14 17:36, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 03:56:42PM +0100, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
>> Me and Rohan would like a second opinion on bug 1378789
>> [SRU] Set the default IO scheduler to CFQ in Kubuntu Trusty
On 2014-10-08 09:36:03 Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> I don't think it's at all appropriate for a desktop environment to install a
> udev rule which changes the kernel scheduler. That's a severe layering
> violation, and it means that anyone who installs kubuntu-desktop on an
> existing system will si
Hi Colin,
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 05:42:48PM +0100, Colin Ian King wrote:
> > Also, what exactly do you mean when you say baloo doesn't "implement ionice
> > support"? The 'ionice' tool is part of the base system (util-linux). It
> > would be a simple matter of packaging to always run baloo unde
Hi Jonathan,
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 03:56:42PM +0100, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> Me and Rohan would like a second opinion on bug 1378789
> [SRU] Set the default IO scheduler to CFQ in Kubuntu Trusty
> https://launchpad.net/bugs/1378789
> The kernel team have changed the scheduler away from upst
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 12:49:05PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 07:34:12AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > If they aren't going to reuse the version number, why not go ahead and
> > release? Seems much simpler workflow wise and if there's a problem,
> > they're
> > bump
Me and Rohan would like a second opinion on bug 1378789
[SRU] Set the default IO scheduler to CFQ in Kubuntu Trusty
https://launchpad.net/bugs/1378789
The kernel team have changed the scheduler away from upstream Linux
defaults to deadlock which causes our desktop indexing programme Baloo
to run
On 08/10/14 22:34, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 08, 2014 11:32:27 Robie Basak wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 07:30:49PM -0600, Adam Conrad wrote:
>>> If upstream doesn't intend to reuse version numbers...
>> Right. I've discussed this with upstream and they have committed to n
On Wednesday, October 08, 2014 17:38:01 Martin Pitt wrote:
> Robie Basak [2014-10-08 11:19 +0100]:
> > We don't have automatic dep8 test runs in trusty-proposed yet (which is
> > bug 1321691), but this is something that is desirable. When we do have
> > it, we're going to have a ton more QA going o
Robie Basak [2014-10-08 11:19 +0100]:
> We don't have automatic dep8 test runs in trusty-proposed yet (which is
> bug 1321691), but this is something that is desirable. When we do have
> it, we're going to have a ton more QA going on in trusty-proposed which
> upstream can't realistically run.
Not
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 07:34:12AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> If they aren't going to reuse the version number, why not go ahead and
> release? Seems much simpler workflow wise and if there's a problem, they're
> bumping to a new version anyway. Nothing says they have to advertise the new
On Wednesday, October 08, 2014 11:32:27 Robie Basak wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 07:30:49PM -0600, Adam Conrad wrote:
> > If upstream doesn't intend to reuse version numbers...
>
> Right. I've discussed this with upstream and they have committed to not
> re-using version numbers that they have
The following universe packages have new reverse dependencies
in main or got seeded. They need to get a MainInclusionReport and be
promoted, or the reverse dependencies in main need to be dropped:
o click-bin-path: click-bin-path
[Reverse-Depends: Ubuntu.Utopic system-image seed]
o cli
Replying to both Steve and Adam here, since I think they touch upon the
same point.
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 05:14:57PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Given that Juju is covered by a provisional micro release exception[1], I
> don't understand the ordering concern. MREs are granted on the conditio
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 06:49:05AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Steve Langasek [2014-10-07 17:14 -0700]:
> > Given that Juju is covered by a provisional micro release exception[1], I
> > don't understand the ordering concern. MREs are granted on the condition
> > that the upstream release process i
17 matches
Mail list logo
