Hi Barry,
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 03:32:12PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> I've filed an SRU for ubuntu-image for 16.10. See LP: #1634218.
> I'm also using this opportunity to request an SRU exception for ubuntu-image
> going forward. The rationale is in the bug description, and generally aligns
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 09:19:50PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:41:26PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > I understand the intent. Testing -proposed as a whole then still leaves you
> > the problem of root-causing any regressions. Have you had success in
> > feeding back
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:41:26PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I understand the intent. Testing -proposed as a whole then still leaves you
> the problem of root-causing any regressions. Have you had success in
> feeding back the results of your testing into the SRU process?
I'd like to presen
Hi Jason,
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:37:25AM -0600, Jason DeRose wrote:
> >I don't think end users should be installing random packages from -proposed
> >for purposes of fuzz testing of SRUs; it's just not worth the collateral
> >damage nowadays.
> While I agree that *most* users shouldn't be bot
On 10/17/2016 01:55 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi Robie,
[corrected the launchpad bug cc]
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:57:07PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote:
I just filed this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1634201; I
Cc'd the bug so as to try and not fragment any discussion.
During
