Re: OpenJDK SRU exception

2018-03-23 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 09:43:40PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 11:58 AM, Tiago Daitx > wrote: > > On behalf of the Ubuntu Foundations Team, I am requesting an SRU > > exception for OpenJDK. Our plan is to release OpenJDK 10 as the > > default

Re: OpenJDK SRU exception

2018-03-23 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Tiago, Thanks for this additional analysis. This is useful to understand in light of the concerns (which we discussed off list) that future releases of OpenJDK between 9 and 11 may not be fully binary compatible after all with binaries built against OpenJDK8, and may therefore not be a viable

New component-mismatches for source universe -> main

2018-03-23 Thread process-component-mismatches-diff
The following universe packages have new reverse dependencies in main or got seeded. They need to get a MainInclusionReport and be promoted, or the reverse dependencies in main need to be dropped: o python-nacl: python-nacl-doc python3-nacl MIR: #1747460 (Incomplete for Ubuntu Security

Re: SRUs solely for dep8 updates

2018-03-23 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:04:11AM +, Robie Basak wrote: > > > I've always been reluctant to accept SRUs for things that are not user > > > impacting. > > > For consistency, please could we decide a policy on this? > > To understand, are you looking for consistency because you think the

New component-mismatches for source universe -> main

2018-03-23 Thread process-component-mismatches-diff
The following universe packages have new reverse dependencies in main or got seeded. They need to get a MainInclusionReport and be promoted, or the reverse dependencies in main need to be dropped: MIR: #1757411 (Fix Released) Please see

Re: OpenJDK SRU exception

2018-03-23 Thread Tiago Daitx
On behalf of the Ubuntu Foundations Team, I would like to provide further information on the outstanding issues of the OpenJDK 9 transition. Of the 35 direct reverse build and runtime dependencies of java-common in Bionic/main, which amount to 26 source packages, there are 5 that currently FTBFS

Re: Request to reset src:mariadb-10.1 to previous known working state in Ubuntu archives

2018-03-23 Thread Robie Basak
Hi Otto, I guess that the discussion is complete now? How do you want to proceed? Will you upload a src:mariadb-10.1 update to Debian? If not, I suppose I need to upload a src:mariadb-10.1 upload to Ubuntu to fix it for Bionic at least? Robie signature.asc Description: PGP signature --