On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 11:13:14AM -0300, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> I have noticed that rebuilding ocaml-ssl in bionic against openssl
> 1.1.1 changes the magic provides...
> ... should we rebuild the ocaml things that change the provides from
> ocaml-ssl and down? I don't think it's many packa
I have noticed that rebuilding ocaml-ssl in bionic against openssl
1.1.1 changes the magic provides...
... should we rebuild the ocaml things that change the provides from
ocaml-ssl and down? I don't think it's many packages, just a few
(based on the transition tracker for ocaml)
--
Regards,
Di
On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 at 05:47, David Mohammed wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have been looking a little more closely as to why geary [1] has
> not been promoted to the eoan-release pocket. It is due to a number
> of build test failures for the S390X and ppc64el architectures [2][3].
>
> Working with
Hi all,
I have been looking a little more closely as to why geary [1] has
not been promoted to the eoan-release pocket. It is due to a number
of build test failures for the S390X and ppc64el architectures [2][3].
Working with the geary maintainer [4] and using the upstream git
master [5] ther
