On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 3:14 PM Aaron Rainbolt wrote:
> The tool is called openQA. Quoting from the description of its package
> in the Ubuntu universe repository:
Some volunteers in Debian use openQA. Here are links with more information:
On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 12:39 PM Erich Eickmeyer wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, August 2, 2022 10:16:53 AM PDT Simon Quigley wrote:
> > As for why this is coming up *now* in the first place, I don't have the
> > slightest clue. In the year 2022, flavors need to at least smoke test
> > *once*, *especially*
On Tuesday, August 2, 2022 10:16:53 AM PDT Simon Quigley wrote:
> As for why this is coming up *now* in the first place, I don't have the
> slightest clue. In the year 2022, flavors need to at least smoke test
> *once*, *especially* for an LTS release, to ensure Secure Boot works.
> Look, I get
Hello,
This email is meant to provide an update on Ubuntu Studio's Secure Boot
situation in 22.04.1.
Currently, UEFI Secure Boot installs fail with Ubuntu Studio 22.04 due
to the inclusion of the v4loopback DKMS module, which Erich intends to
remove from the seed in order to fix this bug.
The following universe packages have new reverse dependencies
in main or got seeded. They need to get a MainInclusionReport and be
promoted, or the reverse dependencies in main need to be dropped:
MIR: #1978144 (Won't Fix) [MIR] ipmitool
Please see
The following universe packages have new reverse dependencies
in main or got seeded. They need to get a MainInclusionReport and be
promoted, or the reverse dependencies in main need to be dropped:
MIR: #1978144 (New) [MIR] ipmitool
Please see
Hi Lukasz,
On Mon, 1 Aug 2022 at 23:58, Lukasz Zemczak
wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> We just finished building our first official set of 22.04.1 release
> candidate images. From what we're seeing so far things seem to be
> looking quite nice, so fingers-crossed for those being our final ones!
>
