Re: MRE request for Bind9

2023-03-02 Thread Lukasz Zemczak
Thank you for the additional feedback. I think this looks good to go. I would urge to re-enable build-time-tests as soon as possible, since the more automated testing is performed, the more confidence we can have for making sure everything works correctly for the series. If this can be done in one

Re: MRE request for Bind9

2023-03-02 Thread Lena Voytek
Hi Ɓukasz, Thanks for the response, here is the extra information you requested: On Thu, 2023-03-02 at 09:46 +0100, Lukasz Zemczak wrote: > Hello Lena! > > Thank you for filling in the SRU MRE. I think your proposition makes > sense, in general I do not object to having an MRE for this project.

New component-mismatches for source universe -> main

2023-03-02 Thread process-component-mismatches-diff
The following universe packages have new reverse dependencies in main or got seeded. They need to get a MainInclusionReport and be promoted, or the reverse dependencies in main need to be dropped: MIR: #2008789 (Incomplete for Dominik Viererbe) [MIR] inetutils Please see http://people.canonic

Re: MRE request for Bind9

2023-03-02 Thread Lukasz Zemczak
Hello Lena! Thank you for filling in the SRU MRE. I think your proposition makes sense, in general I do not object to having an MRE for this project. I do have some minor things I'd like us to touch first before proceeding: 1) Does upstream have a schedule for point-releases for stable versions? W