Re: Edubuntu Revival

2023-02-08 Thread eeickmeyer
Hi Release Team, Just giving this a bump as I haven't heard anything in response to this since I posted a week ago. As you can imagine, we're anxious to get moving on this. I'd very much like to know what it is we need to do on our end to get Edubuntu rolling again at this point, since we've rece

Edubuntu Revival

2023-01-31 Thread eeickmeyer
Hello Release Team! As many of you are aware, my wife and I have been working on reviving the Edubuntu flavor, myself being the technical lead and my wife as the flavor lead. She was inspired while we were attending Ubuntu Summmit in Prague this past November while learning of all the things that

Re: New Official Flavor Process Issues (Was Re: Ubuntu Cinnamon Remix packages)

2022-07-28 Thread eeickmeyer
On Thu, 2022-07-28 at 17:14 -0400, Thomas Ward wrote: > So in the TB's defense, this should not have been so rapidly brought > up as a "CC problem" as Erich alone raised it as such, and is now > operating with the CC hat **without** quorate decision that this > needs CC attention. >   That is inco

Re: New Official Flavor Process Issues (Was Re: Ubuntu Cinnamon Remix packages)

2022-07-28 Thread eeickmeyer
On Thu, 2022-07-28 at 08:35 -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 9:22 PM wrote: > > > > Hi Steve, > > > > Your reply brings up a larger discussion which involves not only > > the > > technical board, but also the community council since there are > > community implications that n

New Official Flavor Process Issues (Was Re: Ubuntu Cinnamon Remix packages)

2022-07-27 Thread eeickmeyer
Hi Steve, Your reply brings up a larger discussion which involves not only the technical board, but also the community council since there are community implications that need to be addressed as the wiki entry you referred to is not at all community friendly. For those just joining the conversati