On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 07:55 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I'm willing to help out with SRU team work. I certainly don't have enough
> time to offset your departure, but I should be able to do some of it.
Thanks Scott. :)
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:57:36AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> since there's some concern about merging the teams, and I don't have a
> strong opinion either, let's ditch the idea for now?
> So I guess what remains of my original mail is the proposal to have a
> more regular schedule of who does
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 01:28:03AM -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Steve Langasek's message of Tue May 22 17:21:58 -0700 2012:
> > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 06:24:11AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > > > I also don't see what problem we're trying to solve by merging the
> > > > teams.
> >
>
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 11:57 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> since there's some concern about merging the teams, and I don't have a
> strong opinion either, let's ditch the idea for now?
That seems to be the consensus from the list discussion. I'll update
the UDS blueprints and artifac
I'm willing to help out with SRU team work. I certainly don't have enough time
to offset your departure, but I should be able to do some of it.
Scott K
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ub
Hello all,
since there's some concern about merging the teams, and I don't have a
strong opinion either, let's ditch the idea for now?
So I guess what remains of my original mail is the proposal to have a
more regular schedule of who does SRUs. I already have my hands full
with cleaning up my rem
Excerpts from Steve Langasek's message of Tue May 22 17:21:58 -0700 2012:
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 06:24:11AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > > I also don't see what problem we're trying to solve by merging the teams.
>
> > I do not have a strong opinion about it, but it would simplify the
> > stru
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 06:24:11AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > - Dilution of responsibility: if everyone is responsible, no one is
> >responsible. The finer-grained teams are a useful division of labor,
> >helping to ensure that someone is responsible for day-to-day tasks. Who
> >
Hiya,
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 12:26:18PM +1000, Christopher James Halse Rogers wrote:
> >
> > Looking at pending-updates now for the first time properly, there are a
> > ton of bugs there that it seems are stalled and have been for quite some
> > time. It's a bit overwhelming, but I guess that mo
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 17:08 +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:24:02AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > […]
> > Before we flip the switch and add ~ubuntu-release to ~ubuntu-sru, I'd
> > like to discuss two things for a bit:
> >
> > * Bug mail: u-sru gets tons of bug mail.
Steve Langasek [2012-05-21 12:35 -0700]:
> - The tools are all similar, yes, but there are distinct processes for each
>area of responsibility, which require a certain amount of training. If
>we're batch-combining the teams, how are we making sure that the
>necessary cross-training is
Iain Lane [2012-05-21 17:08 +0100]:
> >When we merge the teams, the whole release team will get that mail,
> >which is unnecessary. It would be enough if one or two people get
> >it and are responsible for watching the mail traffic, it's not
> >necessary for reviewing uploads or mov
On Monday, May 21, 2012 12:35:22 PM Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:24:02AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > as discussed at UDS [1] we were planning to merge ~ubuntu-release and
> > ~ubuntu-sru, as the required skills, tools, and processes overlap to a
> > large degree.
>
> Sorry,
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 05:08:17PM +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
> Looking at pending-updates now for the first time properly, there are a
> ton of bugs there that it seems are stalled and have been for quite some
> time. It's a bit overwhelming, but I guess that most of the entries are
> just stalled bu
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:24:02AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> as discussed at UDS [1] we were planning to merge ~ubuntu-release and
> ~ubuntu-sru, as the required skills, tools, and processes overlap to a
> large degree.
Sorry, apparently I missed the part of the UDS session where this was
discus
Hey,
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:24:02AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> […]
> Before we flip the switch and add ~ubuntu-release to ~ubuntu-sru, I'd
> like to discuss two things for a bit:
>
> * Bug mail: u-sru gets tons of bug mail. A lot of it is irrelevant
>for the SRU team itself, but it stil
Hello release and SRU teams,
as discussed at UDS [1] we were planning to merge ~ubuntu-release and
~ubuntu-sru, as the required skills, tools, and processes overlap to a
large degree.
Before we flip the switch and add ~ubuntu-release to ~ubuntu-sru, I'd
like to discuss two things for a bit:
* B
17 matches
Mail list logo
