On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Adam Conrad wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 03:03:04PM +0530, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
>>
>> And I'll take care to double check the versioning again hereafter.
>>
>> I apologize again that this was purely accidental.
>
> This has nothing to do with versioning, but
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Saturday, December 29, 2012 02:55:51 PM Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Scott Kitterman
> wrote:
>> > Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
>> >>On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Stéphane Graber
>> >>
>> >>wrote:
>> >
On Saturday, December 29, 2012 02:55:51 PM Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Scott Kitterman
wrote:
> > Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
> >>On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Stéphane Graber
> >>
> >>wrote:
> >>> On 12/28/2012 06:37 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> The exist
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 03:03:04PM +0530, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
>
> And I'll take care to double check the versioning again hereafter.
>
> I apologize again that this was purely accidental.
This has nothing to do with versioning, but rather that lintian shouldn't
be in extras AT ALL (and no p
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Scott Kitterman
> wrote:
>> Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Stéphane Graber
>>>wrote:
On 12/28/2012 06:37 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> The existence of
>
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
>
>>On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Stéphane Graber
>>wrote:
>>> On 12/28/2012 06:37 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
The existence of
>>http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/l/lintian/lintian_2.5.11ubu
Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
>On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Stéphane Graber
>wrote:
>> On 12/28/2012 06:37 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>>> The existence of
>>>
>http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/l/lintian/lintian_2.5.11ubuntu12.10.1.dsc
>>> was recently mentioned #ubuntu-devel. This seem
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> On 12/28/2012 06:37 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> The existence of
>> http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/l/lintian/lintian_2.5.11ubuntu12.10.1.dsc
>> was recently mentioned #ubuntu-devel. This seems to be in direct
>> contradiction
On 2012-12-28 19:18, Allison Randal wrote:
> CC'ing Niels for coordination with Debian.
>
Thanks for the heads up.
As Scott wrote (in a separate mail), there is currently not an issue in
Debian experimental. lintian4python/0.11 is the first to support the
Lintian 2.5.11 API[1]+[2].
> [...]
>>>
On Friday, December 28, 2012 10:18:57 AM Allison Randal wrote:
> CC'ing Niels for coordination with Debian.
>
> On 12/28/2012 10:02 AM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> >> The package has now been removed from the archive and should disappear
> >> from the mirror pretty soon.
> >>
> >> The problem is wit
On 12/28/2012 10:30 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
> There's no issue with lintian4python in experimental and lintian 2.5.11.
Oh, good.
> Is there some way extras could be an equivalent of an unapproved queue so
> there would be a chance to catch this kind of thing before it is potentially
> de
On Friday, December 28, 2012 10:18:57 AM Allison Randal wrote:
> CC'ing Niels for coordination with Debian.
>
> On 12/28/2012 10:02 AM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> >> The package has now been removed from the archive and should disappear
> >> from the mirror pretty soon.
> >>
> >> The problem is wit
CC'ing Niels for coordination with Debian.
On 12/28/2012 10:02 AM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
>>
>> The package has now been removed from the archive and should disappear
>> from the mirror pretty soon.
>>
>> The problem is with people who already upgraded to it as it's been
>> reported to causing bre
On 12/28/2012 07:00 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> On 12/28/2012 06:53 PM, Allison Randal wrote:
>> I believe this was an honest mistake. If you follow the discussion on
>> the ARB list, starting at:
>>
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/app-review-board/2012-November/002569.html
>>
>> The intentio
On 12/28/2012 06:53 PM, Allison Randal wrote:
> I believe this was an honest mistake. If you follow the discussion on
> the ARB list, starting at:
>
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/app-review-board/2012-November/002569.html
>
> The intention was that the patched version of lintian (currently
On Friday, December 28, 2012 06:44:37 PM Stéphane Graber wrote:
> On 12/28/2012 06:37 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > The existence of
> > http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/l/lintian/lintian_2.5.11ubuntu12
> > .10.1.dsc was recently mentioned #ubuntu-devel. This seems to be in
> > direct
>
I believe this was an honest mistake. If you follow the discussion on
the ARB list, starting at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/app-review-board/2012-November/002569.html
The intention was that the patched version of lintian (currently in
Debian experimental) would be uploaded to the
~ubuntu-a
On 12/28/2012 06:37 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> The existence of
> http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/l/lintian/lintian_2.5.11ubuntu12.10.1.dsc
>
> was recently mentioned #ubuntu-devel. This seems to be in direct
> contradiction of https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AppReviewBoard/Review/Guidelin
The existence of
http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/l/lintian/lintian_2.5.11ubuntu12.10.1.dsc
was recently mentioned #ubuntu-devel. This seems to be in direct
contradiction of https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AppReviewBoard/Review/Guidelines - in
particular "Apps should not be forks or updates
19 matches
Mail list logo
