The exception - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AdsysUpdates - has been updated to
limit the scope to the implementation of new GPO. New features that are not
new GPO will need explicit approval from the SRU team.
I hope it makes the exception acceptable.
Thanks for considering this exception.
Cheers,
On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 10:34:22PM +1200, Matthew Ruffell wrote:
> Hi JB,
> I too would like to go forward with the entire backport too, but time
> is running short. This user has a SLA deadline of 2023-07-09. I
> submitted patches to the LP bug one month ago on 2023-05-26 and was
> subsequently
Hi JB,
I too would like to go forward with the entire backport too, but time
is running short. This user has a SLA deadline of 2023-07-09. I
submitted patches to the LP bug one month ago on 2023-05-26 and was
subsequently blocked by the 0.12.0 upload in -unapproved on
2023-06-06. The impact for
Hi,
I know discussions are still ongoing about the adsys 0.12.0 SRU, but I
have a user who wishes to have LP #2020834 [1] fixed, which high
priority.
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/+bug/2020834
Would it be possible to potentially reject 0.12.0 from jammy
-unapproved, we get
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 4:43 PM Robie Basak wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 02:59:39PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Lallement wrote:
> > Can you please be concise and provide a list of bullet points that must
> be
> > addressed to move forward?
>
> Question 1. Do you want:
>
> a) an exception that
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 02:59:39PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Lallement wrote:
> Can you please be concise and provide a list of bullet points that must be
> addressed to move forward?
Question 1. Do you want:
a) an exception that allows you to change behaviour on existing
installations when users
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 2:48 PM Robie Basak wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 11:43:12AM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Lallement wrote:
> > This special case is now documented on
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AdsysUpdates
> > . Can you please review this exception?
>
> Thank you for putting this together!
>
>
On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 11:01 PM Robie Basak wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 09:31:42AM +0200, Didier Roche wrote:
>
>
> > I think one way forward is for adsys to file up the Special documented
> cases
> > with all the information above and enter the list where we trust and
> ensure
> > that
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 11:43:12AM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Lallement wrote:
> This special case is now documented on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AdsysUpdates
> . Can you please review this exception?
Thank you for putting this together!
From that text:
> The scope of this exception excludes major
Le 14/06/2023 à 23:00, Robie Basak a écrit :
On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 09:31:42AM +0200, Didier Roche wrote:
Unfortunately, like many projects, there is a constant tension between the
request for new features backport (adsys, as being an enterprise product,
only really makes sense in a LTS
On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 09:00:09AM +0200, Didier Roche wrote:
> >>In other cases where such upstream automatic testing is not
> >>available, exceptions must still be approved by at least one member of
> >>the Ubuntu Technical Board.
> >If the TB is being that specific about *micro*-releases, then
On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 10:00:44PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 09:31:42AM +0200, Didier Roche wrote:
> > Unfortunately, like many projects, there is a constant tension between the
> > request for new features backport (adsys, as being an enterprise product,
> > only really
On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 09:31:42AM +0200, Didier Roche wrote:
> Unfortunately, like many projects, there is a constant tension between the
> request for new features backport (adsys, as being an enterprise product,
> only really makes sense in a LTS context) and bug fixes. Most of the new
>
Hey Chris, let me chime in.
Le 14/06/2023 à 08:26, Christopher James Halse Rogers a écrit :
There's an Jammy/Lunar adsys SRU¹ in the queue at the moment, and I
think it needs bringing to up to the list for discussion.
The changelog looks like approximately 9 months of normal feature
There's an Jammy/Lunar adsys SRU¹ in the queue at the moment, and I
think it needs bringing to up to the list for discussion.
The changelog looks like approximately 9 months of normal feature
development. The diff against Jammy is >3MB in size (due largely to
significant vendored-depende
15 matches
Mail list logo
